netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	edumazet@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mhocko@suse.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/4] net-sysfs: remove rtnl_trylock/restart_syscall use
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 08:57:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231018085717.454931c3@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231018154804.420823-1-atenart@kernel.org>

On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 17:47:42 +0200
Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> This is sent as an RFC because I believe this should be discussed (and
> some might want to do additional testing), but the code itself is ready.
> 
> Some time ago we tried to improve the rtnl_trylock/restart_syscall
> situation[1]. What happens is when there is rtnl contention, userspace
> accessing net sysfs attributes will spin and experience delays. This can
> happen in different situations, when sysfs attributes are accessed
> (networking daemon, configuration, monitoring) while operations under
> rtnl are performed (veth creation, driver configuration, etc). A few
> improvements can be done in userspace to ease things, like using the
> netlink interface instead, or polling less (or more selectively) the
> attributes; but in the end the root cause is always there and this keeps
> happening from time to time.
> 
> That initial effort however wasn't successful, although I think there
> was an interest, mostly because we found technical flaws and didn't find
> a working solution at the time. Some time later, we gave it a new try
> and found something more promising, but the patches fell off my radar. I
> recently had another look at this series, made more tests and cleaned it
> up.
> 
> The technical aspect is described in patch 1 directly in the code
> comments, with an additional important comment in patch 3. This was
> mostly tested by stress-testing net sysfs attributes (read/write ops)
> while adding/removing queues and adding/removing veths, all in parallel.
> 
> All comments are welcomed.

The trylock was introduced to deal with lock inversion.
It is not clear how this more complex solution prevents that.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-18 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-18 15:47 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/4] net-sysfs: remove rtnl_trylock/restart_syscall use Antoine Tenart
2023-10-18 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/4] net-sysfs: remove rtnl_trylock from device attributes Antoine Tenart
2023-10-18 16:49   ` Greg KH
2023-10-19  8:13     ` Antoine Tenart
2023-10-19 15:37       ` Greg KH
2023-10-18 18:13   ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-19  7:48     ` Antoine Tenart
2025-01-02 22:36   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-03  8:41     ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-07 16:30     ` Antoine Tenart
2025-01-07 17:06       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-16 13:36         ` Antoine Tenart
2025-01-16 23:42           ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-16 23:43             ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-17  8:26               ` Antoine Tenart
2023-10-18 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/4] net-sysfs: move queue attribute groups outside the default groups Antoine Tenart
2023-10-18 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/4] net-sysfs: prevent uncleared queues from being re-added Antoine Tenart
2023-10-18 15:47 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/4] net-sysfs: remove rtnl_trylock from queue attributes Antoine Tenart
2023-10-18 15:57 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2023-10-18 16:34   ` [RFC PATCH net-next 0/4] net-sysfs: remove rtnl_trylock/restart_syscall use Antoine Tenart
2023-10-18 18:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-10-19  7:47   ` Antoine Tenart
2023-10-19 14:54     ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231018085717.454931c3@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=atenart@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).