From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E9562F531 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 17:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YVvNKp1G" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56F17C433C8; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 17:40:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1697650816; bh=a4MNBzIoQraa+P47UnuWNFSqE8gtKcdSsgT0BnTe1Vs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=YVvNKp1Gdiy4zquRwSNqkoqP9Y8U1CeEAVV8xmeElCyZ8nCupZmWYM7ZTz1xZB9dY 8AHPqT+TI3kITYLP7q8ccjFQhl5JV9Bc9bjmAkXAEHYzrFH3pve6CqtbDbab8Bnnl6 yeua8COeRAd6q1xaRDSLEgFDq1OkCzqHdXUlq6CcxFeAVmCICPR5MnkBm18/eiBt41 8QYwyXm+zebSU3kSVNasCwuS+26jLzVO1PBQflcoYVqsHuyli5k4x7yd6eHqQ3+FrA jLTRGDCWrhp4z06IZP4FBWDo7gCM7ZJixinvMqNLCMPyUeDoFTldAABiA8VYmt/mUv au/6sQvEm84NQ== Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 10:40:15 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Harald Welte Cc: takeru hayasaka , Jesse Brandeburg , Tony Nguyen , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Willem de Bruijn , Pablo Neira Ayuso , osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ethtool: ice: Support for RSS settings to GTP from ethtool Message-ID: <20231018104015.42b2465b@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20231012060115.107183-1-hayatake396@gmail.com> <20231016152343.1fc7c7be@kernel.org> <20231017164915.23757eed@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 10:12:44 +0200 Harald Welte wrote: > > If we were to propose again, setting aside considerations specific to > > Intel, I believe, considering the users of ethtool, the smallest units > > should be gtpu4|6 and gtpc4|6. > > agreed. Though I'm not entirely sure one would usually want to treat v4 > different from v6. I'd assume they would usually both follow the same > RSS scheme? FWIW I had the same thought. But if we do add flow matching support for GTP one day we'll have to define a struct like struct ethtool_tcpip4_spec, which means size of the address matters?