From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B84CF3FE4F for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 18:16:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Nco4Zz3R" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5926EC433C7; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 18:16:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1697652968; bh=Ct9gR9nllChCdIfEvz/HYXItxKyJ157uTxTGorys+KY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Nco4Zz3RCjMP2/4unO1zaVALBkrBBtB1bm2vkjdgz6OiCI5WdntbNLVDsSqfe3plb uG1uKJPFqRSFpgT6hOC9UwwqGMHcueSf++oMDMp9WtdG+wB1rDdodLD/d3MCSdxwin Up33Ui6lECUuOAntWYlX8uiTYeOJgycUZHJq2Lathd9OZiwFuELjedwOOQ5qaYf3pC y4TytzyvBPFer72dXF7koBEl/zob4cRbYXOHPUrHg9B4oWhLctzWMrhTAqHF8/Viiy fBXRquNpZsrGHLwOKuMHSAcdFh/HnUWlfcKkIAgIF+yu9tPgy9WbfPPJh1AMUR3s/R XJwcB4Fs259uQ== Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 11:16:06 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Nishanth Menon Cc: Ravi Gunasekaran , Neha Malcom Francis , , , , , , , , , , , , Thejasvi Konduru , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_mdio: Fix the revision string for J721E Message-ID: <20231018111606.4af0cdb3@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20231018180035.saymfqwc2o3xpdf4@pretense> References: <20231018140009.1725-1-r-gunasekaran@ti.com> <20231018154448.vlunpwbw67xeh4rj@unfasten> <20231018105236.347b2354@kernel.org> <20231018180035.saymfqwc2o3xpdf4@pretense> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 13:00:35 -0500 Nishanth Menon wrote: > Thanks Jakub. SoC tree needs me to send based off rc1 for new features. > I'd rather not mess with that. > > Sure if we are doing an fixes pull, we can figure something out to > sync. rc1 saves us the headache of conflict of me sending a PR merge > while netdev maintainers aren't expecting it to be merged to master > via soc tree. Sounds good, I'll wait for Ravi to respond to you and once we have a green light we can plonk the patch on top of rc1.