* BUG: looking up invalid subclass: 8
@ 2023-10-17 23:41 Eric Wheeler
2023-10-18 0:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Wheeler @ 2023-10-17 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Hello all:
We are running Linux 6.5.7 and are getting the following trace in dmesg.
I found a similar backtrace that was fixed in
3510c7aa069aa83a2de6dab2b41401a198317bdc . It was for ALSA, but had the
same BUG of "looking up invalid subclass: 8" and the fix was trivial,
noting that MAX_HOPS shouldn't be bigger than MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES.
Is there a simple fix for this in netlink, too?
]# ./scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh vmlinux `pwd` < stackdump.txt
[ 113.347055] BUG: looking up invalid subclass: 8
[ 113.357387] turning off the locking correctness validator.
[ 113.364842] Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/H11SSL-i, BIOS 2.4 12/27/2021
[ 113.373614] Call Trace:
[ 113.381874] <TASK>
[ 113.382556] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:108)
[ 113.388816] look_up_lock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:941)
[ 113.399562] register_lock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1284 (discriminator 13))
[ 113.400238] ? srso_return_thunk (arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S:308)
[ 113.403627] __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5014)
[ 113.414652] lock_acquire.part.0 (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:467 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5755)
[ 113.428619] ? srso_return_thunk (arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S:308)
[ 113.435463] ? lock_acquire (./include/trace/events/lock.h:24 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5724)
[ 113.440620] _raw_spin_lock_nested (kernel/locking/spinlock.c:379)
[ 113.462749] ? __nla_validate_parse (lib/nlattr.c:606)
[ 113.471052] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0 (net/netlink/genetlink.c:970)
[ 113.471651] genl_family_rcv_msg (net/netlink/genetlink.c:1050)
[ 113.483623] genl_rcv_msg (net/netlink/genetlink.c:1069)
[ 113.489055] ? __pfx_genl_rcv_msg (net/netlink/genetlink.c:1056)
[ 113.489623] netlink_rcv_skb (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2519)
[ 113.492711] genl_rcv (net/netlink/genetlink.c:1079)
[ 113.502610] netlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1338 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1363)
[ 113.506927] netlink_sendmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1885)
[ 113.507486] sock_write_iter (net/socket.c:725 net/socket.c:740 net/socket.c:1147)
[ 113.510657] vfs_write (./include/linux/fs.h:1877 fs/read_write.c:491 fs/read_write.c:584)
[ 113.519624] ksys_write (fs/read_write.c:637)
[ 113.524713] do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80)
[ 113.525233] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120)
[ 113.526621] RIP: 0033:0x7f41c473e987
[ 113.535618] Code: 0b 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85
Code starting with the faulting instruction
===========================================
0: 0b 00 or (%rax),%eax
2: f7 d8 neg %eax
4: 64 89 02 mov %eax,%fs:(%rdx)
7: 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff mov $0xffffffffffffffff,%rax
e: eb b7 jmp 0xffffffffffffffc7
10: 0f 1f 00 nopl (%rax)
13: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64
17: 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 mov %fs:0x18,%eax
1e: 00
1f: 85 .byte 0x85
c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24
[ 113.543013] RSP: 002b:00007ffe80a28648 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
[ 113.543627] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000000c8 RCX: 00007f41c473e987
[ 113.552607] RDX: 00000000000000c8 RSI: 000055be8e4f7320 RDI: 0000000000000004
[ 113.560243] RBP: 000055be8e4f7320 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 113.560803] R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000000c8
[ 113.561353] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00007ffe80a28970 R15: 000055be8d383848
[ 113.569626] </TASK>
--
Eric Wheeler
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: BUG: looking up invalid subclass: 8
2023-10-17 23:41 BUG: looking up invalid subclass: 8 Eric Wheeler
@ 2023-10-18 0:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-18 18:44 ` Eric Wheeler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2023-10-18 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Wheeler; +Cc: netdev
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 16:41:41 -0700 (PDT) Eric Wheeler wrote:
> I found a similar backtrace that was fixed in
> 3510c7aa069aa83a2de6dab2b41401a198317bdc . It was for ALSA, but had the
> same BUG of "looking up invalid subclass: 8" and the fix was trivial,
> noting that MAX_HOPS shouldn't be bigger than MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES.
>
> Is there a simple fix for this in netlink, too?
>
> ]# ./scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh vmlinux `pwd` < stackdump.txt
> [ 113.347055] BUG: looking up invalid subclass: 8
> [ 113.357387] turning off the locking correctness validator.
> [ 113.364842] Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/H11SSL-i, BIOS 2.4 12/27/2021
> [ 113.373614] Call Trace:
> [ 113.381874] <TASK>
> [ 113.382556] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:108)
> [ 113.388816] look_up_lock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:941)
> [ 113.399562] register_lock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1284 (discriminator 13))
> [ 113.400238] ? srso_return_thunk (arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S:308)
> [ 113.403627] __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5014)
> [ 113.414652] lock_acquire.part.0 (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:467 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5755)
> [ 113.428619] ? srso_return_thunk (arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S:308)
> [ 113.435463] ? lock_acquire (./include/trace/events/lock.h:24 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5724)
> [ 113.440620] _raw_spin_lock_nested (kernel/locking/spinlock.c:379)
> [ 113.462749] ? __nla_validate_parse (lib/nlattr.c:606)
> [ 113.471052] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0 (net/netlink/genetlink.c:970)
> [ 113.471651] genl_family_rcv_msg (net/netlink/genetlink.c:1050)
Thanks for sharing the decoded stack trace, can you share the full
non-decoded one? Is there the name of the command that's calling
this somewhere?
There's no lock where this is pointing at, just an indirect call.
So I wonder where the lock is. Perhaps retpoline is confusing
the stack trace :(
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: BUG: looking up invalid subclass: 8
2023-10-18 0:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2023-10-18 18:44 ` Eric Wheeler
2023-10-18 18:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-18 18:53 ` Eric Wheeler
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Wheeler @ 2023-10-18 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski; +Cc: netdev
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 16:41:41 -0700 (PDT) Eric Wheeler wrote:
> > I found a similar backtrace that was fixed in
> > 3510c7aa069aa83a2de6dab2b41401a198317bdc . It was for ALSA, but had the
> > same BUG of "looking up invalid subclass: 8" and the fix was trivial,
> > noting that MAX_HOPS shouldn't be bigger than MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES.
> >
> > Is there a simple fix for this in netlink, too?
> >
> > ]# ./scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh vmlinux `pwd` < stackdump.txt
> > [ 113.347055] BUG: looking up invalid subclass: 8
> > [ 113.357387] turning off the locking correctness validator.
> > [ 113.364842] Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/H11SSL-i, BIOS 2.4 12/27/2021
> > [ 113.373614] Call Trace:
> > [ 113.381874] <TASK>
> > [ 113.382556] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:108)
> > [ 113.388816] look_up_lock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:941)
> > [ 113.399562] register_lock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1284 (discriminator 13))
> > [ 113.400238] ? srso_return_thunk (arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S:308)
> > [ 113.403627] __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5014)
> > [ 113.414652] lock_acquire.part.0 (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:467 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5755)
> > [ 113.428619] ? srso_return_thunk (arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S:308)
> > [ 113.435463] ? lock_acquire (./include/trace/events/lock.h:24 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5724)
> > [ 113.440620] _raw_spin_lock_nested (kernel/locking/spinlock.c:379)
> > [ 113.462749] ? __nla_validate_parse (lib/nlattr.c:606)
> > [ 113.471052] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0 (net/netlink/genetlink.c:970)
> > [ 113.471651] genl_family_rcv_msg (net/netlink/genetlink.c:1050)
>
> Thanks for sharing the decoded stack trace, can you share the full
> non-decoded one? Is there the name of the command that's calling
> this somewhere?
>
> There's no lock where this is pointing at, just an indirect call.
> So I wonder where the lock is. Perhaps retpoline is confusing
> the stack trace :(
Here it is from two different hosts.
This is vanilla v6.5.7:
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: BUG: looking up invalid subclass: 8
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: turning off the locking correctness validator.
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: CPU: 8 PID: 13275 Comm: drbdsetup-84 Tainted: G E 6.5.7 #23
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/H11SSL-i, BIOS 2.4 12/27/2021
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: Call Trace:
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: <TASK>
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xa0
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: look_up_lock_class+0x10b/0x150
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: register_lock_class+0x48/0x500
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x10
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: __lock_acquire+0x5f/0xb80
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: lock_acquire.part.0+0x90/0x210
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_all_resources+0x5a/0x90 [drbd]
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_all_resources+0x5a/0x90 [drbd]
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x10
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_acquire+0x10b/0x120
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_all_resources+0x5a/0x90 [drbd]
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x33/0x80
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_all_resources+0x5a/0x90 [drbd]
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: lock_all_resources+0x5a/0x90 [drbd]
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: drbd_adm_attach+0x748/0x1340 [drbd]
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? __nla_validate_parse+0x13f/0x1f0
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0xe4/0x150
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: genl_family_rcv_msg+0x187/0x260
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? __pfx_drbd_adm_attach+0x10/0x10 [drbd]
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: genl_rcv_msg+0x4b/0xb0
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? __pfx_genl_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: netlink_rcv_skb+0x66/0x120
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: genl_rcv+0x28/0x40
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: netlink_unicast+0x1b8/0x280
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: netlink_sendmsg+0x273/0x520
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: sock_write_iter+0x188/0x190
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: vfs_write+0x3e5/0x520
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ksys_write+0xc8/0x100
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xa0
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7f41c473e987
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: Code: 0b 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffe80a28648 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000000c8 RCX: 00007f41c473e987
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RDX: 00000000000000c8 RSI: 000055be8e4f7320 RDI: 0000000000000004
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RBP: 000055be8e4f7320 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000000c8
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00007ffe80a28970 R15: 000055be8d383848
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: </TASK>
And this is a hacked up Oracle UEK 5.15.0-X build with a similar trace:
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.342188] CPU: 29 PID: 35965 Comm: drbdsetup-84 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.15.0-7.86.6.1.el9uek.x86_64-TEST+ #7
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.358188] Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/H11SSL-i, BIOS 2.4 12/27/2021
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.374188] Call Trace:
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.390189] <TASK>
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.406190] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x7e
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.422187] look_up_lock_class+0xe7/0xfb
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.438187] register_lock_class+0x3d/0x4db
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.454191] __lock_acquire+0x56/0xaa3
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.469193] lock_acquire+0xc8/0x32d
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.484192] ? lock_all_resources+0x54/0x80 [drbd]
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.500053] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x8d
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.515189] ? lock_all_resources+0x54/0x80 [drbd]
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.530198] ? lock_all_resources+0x54/0x80 [drbd]
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.545186] ? __lock_acquired+0x58/0x278
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.559270] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x2f/0x71
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.573191] ? lock_all_resources+0x54/0x80 [drbd]
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.588187] lock_all_resources+0x54/0x80 [drbd]
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.603187] drbd_adm_attach+0x90c/0x1074 [drbd]
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.618191] ? __nla_validate_parse+0x15c/0x1c8
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.632189] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xfd/0x169
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.646192] genl_family_rcv_msg+0xbe/0x179
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.658194] ? drbd_adm_disk_opts.cold+0x77/0x77 [drbd]
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.672195] genl_rcv_msg+0x47/0xa6
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.685194] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x8d
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.698199] ? genl_family_rcv_msg+0x180/0x179
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.711192] netlink_rcv_skb+0x5c/0x106
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.724191] genl_rcv+0x24/0x31
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.736197] netlink_unicast+0x1a5/0x261
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.749188] netlink_sendmsg+0x24f/0x4d5
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.761612] sock_sendmsg+0x68/0x6a
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.773189] sock_write_iter+0x9e/0x10a
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.785193] new_sync_write+0x1da/0x1e9
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.797193] vfs_write+0x276/0x381
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.809188] ksys_write+0xc7/0xf4
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.820190] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x8d
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.831196] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x0
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.843192] RIP: 0033:0x7fdc29a1d987
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.853533] Code: 0b 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.877188] RSP: 002b:00007fff4acbe2a8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.889186] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000000c8 RCX: 00007fdc29a1d987
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.900198] RDX: 00000000000000c8 RSI: 00005583cafa6320 RDI: 0000000000000004
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.911508] RBP: 00005583cafa6320 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.922188] R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000000c8
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.934189] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00007fff4acbe5d0 R15: 00005583ca41d848
Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.945189] </TASK>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: BUG: looking up invalid subclass: 8
2023-10-18 18:44 ` Eric Wheeler
@ 2023-10-18 18:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-18 18:53 ` Eric Wheeler
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2023-10-18 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Wheeler
Cc: netdev, drbd-dev, Philipp Reisner, Lars Ellenberg,
Christoph Böhmwalder
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 11:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Eric Wheeler wrote:
> Here it is from two different hosts.
>
> This is vanilla v6.5.7:
>
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: BUG: looking up invalid subclass: 8
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: turning off the locking correctness validator.
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: CPU: 8 PID: 13275 Comm: drbdsetup-84 Tainted: G E 6.5.7 #23
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/H11SSL-i, BIOS 2.4 12/27/2021
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: Call Trace:
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: <TASK>
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xa0
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: look_up_lock_class+0x10b/0x150
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: register_lock_class+0x48/0x500
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x10
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: __lock_acquire+0x5f/0xb80
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: lock_acquire.part.0+0x90/0x210
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_all_resources+0x5a/0x90 [drbd]
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_all_resources+0x5a/0x90 [drbd]
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x10
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_acquire+0x10b/0x120
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_all_resources+0x5a/0x90 [drbd]
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x33/0x80
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_all_resources+0x5a/0x90 [drbd]
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: lock_all_resources+0x5a/0x90 [drbd]
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: drbd_adm_attach+0x748/0x1340 [drbd]
Oh, that's much clearer, thank you.
The warnings comes from DRBD, genl is just the entry point.
Adding DRBD folks.
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? __nla_validate_parse+0x13f/0x1f0
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0xe4/0x150
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: genl_family_rcv_msg+0x187/0x260
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? __pfx_drbd_adm_attach+0x10/0x10 [drbd]
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: genl_rcv_msg+0x4b/0xb0
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? __pfx_genl_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: netlink_rcv_skb+0x66/0x120
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: genl_rcv+0x28/0x40
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: netlink_unicast+0x1b8/0x280
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: netlink_sendmsg+0x273/0x520
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: sock_write_iter+0x188/0x190
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: vfs_write+0x3e5/0x520
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ksys_write+0xc8/0x100
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xa0
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7f41c473e987
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: Code: 0b 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffe80a28648 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000000c8 RCX: 00007f41c473e987
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RDX: 00000000000000c8 RSI: 000055be8e4f7320 RDI: 0000000000000004
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RBP: 000055be8e4f7320 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000000c8
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00007ffe80a28970 R15: 000055be8d383848
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: </TASK>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: BUG: looking up invalid subclass: 8
2023-10-18 18:44 ` Eric Wheeler
2023-10-18 18:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2023-10-18 18:53 ` Eric Wheeler
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Wheeler @ 2023-10-18 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski; +Cc: netdev
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023, Eric Wheeler wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2023, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 16:41:41 -0700 (PDT) Eric Wheeler wrote:
> > > I found a similar backtrace that was fixed in
> > > 3510c7aa069aa83a2de6dab2b41401a198317bdc . It was for ALSA, but had the
> > > same BUG of "looking up invalid subclass: 8" and the fix was trivial,
> > > noting that MAX_HOPS shouldn't be bigger than MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES.
> > >
> > > Is there a simple fix for this in netlink, too?
> > >
> > > ]# ./scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh vmlinux `pwd` < stackdump.txt
> > > [ 113.347055] BUG: looking up invalid subclass: 8
> > > [ 113.357387] turning off the locking correctness validator.
> > > [ 113.364842] Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/H11SSL-i, BIOS 2.4 12/27/2021
> > > [ 113.373614] Call Trace:
> > > [ 113.381874] <TASK>
> > > [ 113.382556] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:108)
> > > [ 113.388816] look_up_lock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:941)
> > > [ 113.399562] register_lock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1284 (discriminator 13))
> > > [ 113.400238] ? srso_return_thunk (arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S:308)
> > > [ 113.403627] __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5014)
> > > [ 113.414652] lock_acquire.part.0 (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:467 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5755)
> > > [ 113.428619] ? srso_return_thunk (arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S:308)
> > > [ 113.435463] ? lock_acquire (./include/trace/events/lock.h:24 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5724)
> > > [ 113.440620] _raw_spin_lock_nested (kernel/locking/spinlock.c:379)
> > > [ 113.462749] ? __nla_validate_parse (lib/nlattr.c:606)
> > > [ 113.471052] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0 (net/netlink/genetlink.c:970)
> > > [ 113.471651] genl_family_rcv_msg (net/netlink/genetlink.c:1050)
> >
> > Thanks for sharing the decoded stack trace, can you share the full
> > non-decoded one? Is there the name of the command that's calling
> > this somewhere?
> >
> > There's no lock where this is pointing at, just an indirect call.
> > So I wonder where the lock is. Perhaps retpoline is confusing
> > the stack trace :(
Hmm, I just noticed the original decoded trace is different and does not
include drbd. I don't know that I have the output that specifies the
command, just this much starting at "BUG". I only copy-pasted enough to
get the decode. This is the dump from the first email to netdev (scroll
down, more commentary below the dump):
]# cat stackdump.txt
[ 113.347055] BUG: looking up invalid subclass: 8
[ 113.357387] turning off the locking correctness validator.
[ 113.364842] Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/H11SSL-i, BIOS 2.4 12/27/2021
[ 113.373614] Call Trace:
[ 113.381874] <TASK>
[ 113.382556] dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xa0
[ 113.388816] look_up_lock_class+0x10b/0x150
[ 113.399562] register_lock_class+0x48/0x500
[ 113.400238] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x10
[ 113.403627] __lock_acquire+0x5f/0xb80
[ 113.414652] lock_acquire.part.0+0x90/0x210
[ 113.428619] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x10
[ 113.435463] ? lock_acquire+0x10b/0x120
[ 113.440620] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x33/0x80
[ 113.462749] ? __nla_validate_parse+0x13f/0x1f0
[ 113.471052] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0xe4/0x150
[ 113.471651] genl_family_rcv_msg+0x187/0x260
[ 113.483623] genl_rcv_msg+0x4b/0xb0
[ 113.489055] ? __pfx_genl_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10
[ 113.489623] netlink_rcv_skb+0x66/0x120
[ 113.492711] genl_rcv+0x28/0x40
[ 113.502610] netlink_unicast+0x1b8/0x280
[ 113.506927] netlink_sendmsg+0x273/0x520
[ 113.507486] sock_write_iter+0x188/0x190
[ 113.510657] vfs_write+0x3e5/0x520
[ 113.519624] ksys_write+0xc8/0x100
[ 113.524713] do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xa0
[ 113.525233] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
[ 113.526621] RIP: 0033:0x7f41c473e987
[ 113.535618] Code: 0b 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85
c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24
[ 113.543013] RSP: 002b:00007ffe80a28648 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
[ 113.543627] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000000c8 RCX: 00007f41c473e987
[ 113.552607] RDX: 00000000000000c8 RSI: 000055be8e4f7320 RDI: 0000000000000004
[ 113.560243] RBP: 000055be8e4f7320 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 113.560803] R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000000c8
[ 113.561353] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00007ffe80a28970 R15: 000055be8d383848
[ 113.569626] </TASK>
> Here it is from two different hosts.
>
> This is vanilla v6.5.7:
>
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: BUG: looking up invalid subclass: 8
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: turning off the locking correctness validator.
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: CPU: 8 PID: 13275 Comm: drbdsetup-84 Tainted: G E 6.5.7 #23
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/H11SSL-i, BIOS 2.4 12/27/2021
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: Call Trace:
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: <TASK>
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xa0
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: look_up_lock_class+0x10b/0x150
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: register_lock_class+0x48/0x500
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x10
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: __lock_acquire+0x5f/0xb80
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: lock_acquire.part.0+0x90/0x210
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_all_resources+0x5a/0x90 [drbd]
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_all_resources+0x5a/0x90 [drbd]
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x10
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_acquire+0x10b/0x120
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_all_resources+0x5a/0x90 [drbd]
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x33/0x80
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_all_resources+0x5a/0x90 [drbd]
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: lock_all_resources+0x5a/0x90 [drbd]
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: drbd_adm_attach+0x748/0x1340 [drbd]
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? __nla_validate_parse+0x13f/0x1f0
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0xe4/0x150
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: genl_family_rcv_msg+0x187/0x260
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? __pfx_drbd_adm_attach+0x10/0x10 [drbd]
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: genl_rcv_msg+0x4b/0xb0
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? __pfx_genl_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: netlink_rcv_skb+0x66/0x120
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: genl_rcv+0x28/0x40
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: netlink_unicast+0x1b8/0x280
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: netlink_sendmsg+0x273/0x520
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: sock_write_iter+0x188/0x190
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: vfs_write+0x3e5/0x520
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ksys_write+0xc8/0x100
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xa0
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7f41c473e987
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: Code: 0b 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffe80a28648 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000000c8 RCX: 00007f41c473e987
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RDX: 00000000000000c8 RSI: 000055be8e4f7320 RDI: 0000000000000004
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RBP: 000055be8e4f7320 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000000c8
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00007ffe80a28970 R15: 000055be8d383848
> Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: </TASK>
It is interesting that the original trace did _not_ have drbd in the
trace: Here is the decode for the one above that _does_ have DRBD:
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:108)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: look_up_lock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:941)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: register_lock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1284 (discriminator 13))
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? srso_return_thunk (arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S:308)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5014)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: lock_acquire.part.0 (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:467 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5755)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_all_resources (drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c:3715 (discriminator 3)) drbd
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_all_resources (drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c:3715 (discriminator 3)) drbd
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? srso_return_thunk (arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S:308)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_acquire (./include/trace/events/lock.h:24 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5724)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_all_resources (drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c:3715 (discriminator 3)) drbd
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: _raw_spin_lock_nested (kernel/locking/spinlock.c:379)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? lock_all_resources (drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c:3715 (discriminator 3)) drbd
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: lock_all_resources (drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c:3715 (discriminator 3)) drbd
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: drbd_adm_attach (drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c:1954) drbd
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? __nla_validate_parse (lib/nlattr.c:606)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0 (net/netlink/genetlink.c:970)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: genl_family_rcv_msg (net/netlink/genetlink.c:1050)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? __pfx_drbd_adm_attach (drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c:1723) drbd
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: genl_rcv_msg (net/netlink/genetlink.c:1069)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ? __pfx_genl_rcv_msg (net/netlink/genetlink.c:1056)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: netlink_rcv_skb (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2519)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: genl_rcv (net/netlink/genetlink.c:1079)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: netlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1338 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1363)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: netlink_sendmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1885)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: sock_write_iter (net/socket.c:725 net/socket.c:740 net/socket.c:1147)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: vfs_write (./include/linux/fs.h:1877 fs/read_write.c:491 fs/read_write.c:584)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: ksys_write (fs/read_write.c:637)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120)
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7f41c473e987
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: Code: 0b 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e
Code starting with the faulting instruction
===========================================
0: 0b 00 or (%rax),%eax
2: f7 d8 neg %eax
4: 64 89 02 mov %eax,%fs:(%rdx)
7: 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff mov $0xffffffffffffffff,%rax
e: eb b7 jmp 0xffffffffffffffc7
10: 0f 1f 00 nopl (%rax)
13: f3 repz
14: 0f .byte 0xf
15: 1e (bad)
fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24
18 48 89 74 24
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffe80a28648 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000000c8 RCX: 00007f41c473e987
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RDX: 00000000000000c8 RSI: 000055be8e4f7320 RDI: 0000000000000004
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: RBP: 000055be8e4f7320 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000000c8
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00007ffe80a28970 R15: 000055be8d383848
Oct 16 09:48:47 hv1.ewheeler.net kernel: </TASK>
--
Eric
> And this is a hacked up Oracle UEK 5.15.0-X build with a similar trace:
>
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.342188] CPU: 29 PID: 35965 Comm: drbdsetup-84 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.15.0-7.86.6.1.el9uek.x86_64-TEST+ #7
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.358188] Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/H11SSL-i, BIOS 2.4 12/27/2021
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.374188] Call Trace:
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.390189] <TASK>
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.406190] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x7e
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.422187] look_up_lock_class+0xe7/0xfb
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.438187] register_lock_class+0x3d/0x4db
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.454191] __lock_acquire+0x56/0xaa3
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.469193] lock_acquire+0xc8/0x32d
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.484192] ? lock_all_resources+0x54/0x80 [drbd]
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.500053] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x8d
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.515189] ? lock_all_resources+0x54/0x80 [drbd]
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.530198] ? lock_all_resources+0x54/0x80 [drbd]
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.545186] ? __lock_acquired+0x58/0x278
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.559270] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x2f/0x71
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.573191] ? lock_all_resources+0x54/0x80 [drbd]
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.588187] lock_all_resources+0x54/0x80 [drbd]
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.603187] drbd_adm_attach+0x90c/0x1074 [drbd]
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.618191] ? __nla_validate_parse+0x15c/0x1c8
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.632189] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xfd/0x169
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.646192] genl_family_rcv_msg+0xbe/0x179
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.658194] ? drbd_adm_disk_opts.cold+0x77/0x77 [drbd]
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.672195] genl_rcv_msg+0x47/0xa6
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.685194] ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x8d
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.698199] ? genl_family_rcv_msg+0x180/0x179
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.711192] netlink_rcv_skb+0x5c/0x106
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.724191] genl_rcv+0x24/0x31
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.736197] netlink_unicast+0x1a5/0x261
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.749188] netlink_sendmsg+0x24f/0x4d5
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.761612] sock_sendmsg+0x68/0x6a
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.773189] sock_write_iter+0x9e/0x10a
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.785193] new_sync_write+0x1da/0x1e9
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.797193] vfs_write+0x276/0x381
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.809188] ksys_write+0xc7/0xf4
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.820190] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x8d
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.831196] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x0
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.843192] RIP: 0033:0x7fdc29a1d987
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.853533] Code: 0b 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.877188] RSP: 002b:00007fff4acbe2a8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.889186] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000000c8 RCX: 00007fdc29a1d987
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.900198] RDX: 00000000000000c8 RSI: 00005583cafa6320 RDI: 0000000000000004
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.911508] RBP: 00005583cafa6320 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.922188] R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000000c8
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.934189] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00007fff4acbe5d0 R15: 00005583ca41d848
> Oct 16 10:56:58 hv2.ewheeler.net [ 406.945189] </TASK>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-18 18:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-10-17 23:41 BUG: looking up invalid subclass: 8 Eric Wheeler
2023-10-18 0:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-18 18:44 ` Eric Wheeler
2023-10-18 18:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-18 18:53 ` Eric Wheeler
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).