netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Cc: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
	Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>,
	Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wwan: replace deprecated strncpy with strscpy_pad
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 22:35:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202310182232.A569D262@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231018-strncpy-drivers-net-wwan-rpmsg_wwan_ctrl-c-v1-1-4e343270373a@google.com>

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 10:14:55PM +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
> strncpy() is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings
> [1] and as such we should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string
> interfaces.
> 
> We expect chinfo.name to be NUL-terminated based on its use with format
> strings and sprintf:
> rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> 165:            dev_err(dev, "failed to open %s\n", eptdev->chinfo.name);
> 368:    return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", eptdev->chinfo.name);
> 
> ... and with strcmp():
> |  static struct rpmsg_endpoint *qcom_glink_create_ept(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
> |  						    rpmsg_rx_cb_t cb,
> |  						    void *priv,
> |  						    struct rpmsg_channel_info
> |  									chinfo)
> |  ...
> |  const char *name = chinfo.name;
> |  ...
> |  		if (!strcmp(channel->name, name))
> 
> Moreover, as chinfo is not kzalloc'd, let's opt to NUL-pad the
> destination buffer
> 
> Similar change to:
> Commit 766279a8f85d ("rpmsg: qcom: glink: replace strncpy() with strscpy_pad()")
> and
> Commit 08de420a8014 ("rpmsg: glink: Replace strncpy() with strscpy_pad()")
> 
> Considering the above, a suitable replacement is `strscpy_pad` due to
> the fact that it guarantees both NUL-termination and NUL-padding on the
> destination buffer.
> 
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strncpy-on-nul-terminated-strings [1]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90
> Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
> ---
> Note: build-tested only.
> 
> Found with: $ rg "strncpy\("
> ---
>  drivers/net/wwan/rpmsg_wwan_ctrl.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/rpmsg_wwan_ctrl.c b/drivers/net/wwan/rpmsg_wwan_ctrl.c
> index 86b60aadfa11..39f5e780c478 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wwan/rpmsg_wwan_ctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/rpmsg_wwan_ctrl.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int rpmsg_wwan_ctrl_start(struct wwan_port *port)
>  		.dst = RPMSG_ADDR_ANY,
>  	};

"chinfo" is initialized immediately above here, which means that it is
actually already zero filled for all the members that aren't explicitly
initialized, so the _pad variant isn't needed. I suspect Dead Store
Elimination will optimize it all away anyway, so this is probably fine.

>  
> -	strncpy(chinfo.name, rpwwan->rpdev->id.name, RPMSG_NAME_SIZE);
> +	strscpy_pad(chinfo.name, rpwwan->rpdev->id.name, sizeof(chinfo.name));

Yup, sizeof() replacement looks correct:

struct rpmsg_channel_info {
        char name[RPMSG_NAME_SIZE];

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-19  5:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-18 22:14 [PATCH] net: wwan: replace deprecated strncpy with strscpy_pad Justin Stitt
2023-10-19  5:35 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-10-19 13:39   ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-10-20  0:15     ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202310182232.A569D262@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com \
    --cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).