From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCE001805D for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 11:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bDPXtsxS" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1219DC433C8; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 11:01:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1697713290; bh=ctzI0zVQ+/BXXhmiWUb7e9S8RnaVKm1Dt2VwODUgsyM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bDPXtsxShqd7hfbJhahnuDoppSq6DwvQ+CBGkeU2gT1049qUz1d7GcIO2J/ACxvnB beFYVm6wQibknuQpDbxXU5Mhj6GeCM19bPxgz3sMoV+OtUmoL/tzLkA0IJVj6UjKYR PaB4E1t6wk1cv0/Y6nrnJPLrL0Tq+Gj/06yVRKCH1CKRPEvjHgLfaRnHeYkaoYLv9g TvAj/rUlHSBmPqt8AxAWuLT0YdCZY1LRw63YiXROiu2UcqwxwXx/s+gjPNwwh8XW2D JVvupwn77IwDe+GMeBELP59vij6kuoLIs2C3TJ+386sBpoLppa25mCPqJi8xzbpNwN 2kK8bmvr0Z8AA== Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 14:01:26 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Steffen Klassert Cc: Patrisious Haddad , Herbert Xu , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Raed Salem , Saeed Mahameed Subject: Re: [PATCH xfrm-next 5/9] net/mlx5e: Unify esw and normal IPsec status table creation/destruction Message-ID: <20231019110126.GL5392@unreal> References: <20231017121357.GC5392@unreal> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 10:46:05AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 03:13:57PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:38:51AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:15:13PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > From: Patrisious Haddad > > > > > > > > Change normal IPsec flow to use the same creation/destruction functions > > > > for status flow table as that of ESW, which first of all refines the > > > > code to have less code duplication. > > > > > > > > And more importantly, the ESW status table handles IPsec syndrome > > > > checks at steering by HW, which is more efficient than the previous > > > > behaviour we had where it was copied to WQE meta data and checked > > > > by the driver. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Patrisious Haddad > > > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky > > > > > > This one does not apply to the ipsec-next tree. > > > > You are right, sorry about that. It is based on two net-next series > > and I didn't expect such a fast response. > > > > 1. https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231002083832.19746-1-leon@kernel.org/ - accepted. > > 2. https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231014171908.290428-16-saeed@kernel.org/#t - not accepted yet. > > > > Do you feel comfortable with the series/xfrm patches? If yes, Saeed can > > resend the series directly to net-next once patch #2 is accepted. > > The xfrm changes look good and it does not conflict > to anything that is in ipsec-next currently. So > send it to net-next and I'll Ack it. Thanks a lot. > > Thanks!