From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew@lunn.ch, paul.greenwalt@intel.com,
hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, gal@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ethtool: untangle the linkmode and ethtool headers
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 09:21:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231020092151.00a20fcf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231020092429.3pitbl3s6x6aonss@skbuf>
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 12:24:29 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 08:28:15AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ethtool_forced_speed_maps_init);
>
> Is there a rule for EXPORT_SYMBOL() vs EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()? My rule of
> thumb was that symbols used by drivers should get EXPORT_SYMBOL() for
> maximum compatibility with their respective licenses, while symbols
> exported for other core kernel modules should get EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL().
I think that Russell is right that it's author's preference. I don't
have a strong one so I just copy what's in the file. Luck would have
it that the closest was EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ethtool_set_ethtool_phy_ops);
We should perhaps have clearer guidance. You say drivers but even what
we put under drivers/net/ vs net/ is not crystal clear. With some
protocols leaving in one place and others in the other. Pretty core
things like netconsole are under drivers/ and qdiscs which have a
non-GPL API (IIRC) are under net/.
We'd need to consult with people who have more exposure to proprietary
code to figure out good rules. For better or worse I'm not one of them
:(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-20 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-19 15:28 [PATCH net-next] ethtool: untangle the linkmode and ethtool headers Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-19 15:47 ` Greenwalt, Paul
2023-10-20 8:56 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-10-20 9:24 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-10-20 9:27 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-10-20 16:21 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-10-20 9:58 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-10-20 11:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231020092151.00a20fcf@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.greenwalt@intel.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).