From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3225F257D; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 22:39:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="A0zauZf0" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 563EAC433C8; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 22:39:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1698100783; bh=4MMwk1MGS+QvG9o+2//TcaIEs3XEz2JeL3J8WXT1PHo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=A0zauZf0PKXqqw8gZWBOViZSv58zByDUvpwSgHuWdtgnSkA7vGuPkC77wrQYEwYBa 8LrnPklP5WlTq1dPvwyo8YDZIdnIyRHUBAdQB0EMBUnfGUuURhiCiKgdBryjuaO1zC 9o2RMOQq5IZh6hHKiNnFylTwvJgdODfqhCNx/bBaVaifU42FecyFai9iGcyzX/o7Gy TC9zcSfUVu4IqdkuxAP0b1D0z7JckdHcGBN5lxYbv311tDNeLvloDmjpcCehvVegie jIlnI2rC9JLmO/eoac83STE3DeezPNToxhxD/Zk7FBebo+tivVvosLiOlKPLejzZ9S lioHqyBATSAzQ== Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 15:39:42 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Nambiar, Amritha" Cc: Philip Li , , kernel test robot , , Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v5 01/10] netdev-genl: spec: Extend netdev netlink spec in YAML for queue Message-ID: <20231023153942.29f6851a@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <8df14e3a-7eb3-412f-89da-69c9e4dee7d4@intel.com> References: <169767396671.6692.9945461089943525792.stgit@anambiarhost.jf.intel.com> <202310190900.9Dzgkbev-lkp@intel.com> <20231020150557.00af950d@kernel.org> <20231023075221.0b873800@kernel.org> <8df14e3a-7eb3-412f-89da-69c9e4dee7d4@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:09:33 -0700 Nambiar, Amritha wrote: > Just checking if this series is dropped from the review queue because of > the build bot warnings... > should I submit a v6 with the single line fix for the warning (legit) on > patch-3, or > should I wait for more feedback (if there is a chance this v5 series > would still be reviewed) and address them all together submitting v6. Repost please, I almost never review stuff that doesn't build cleanly. I'll have to re-review before applying, anyway.