From: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jbohac@suse.cz,
benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.org, davem@davemloft.net,
hideaki.yoshifuji@miraclelinux.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org
Cc: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH resend 2/4] net: ipv6/addrconf: clamp preferred_lft to the minimum required
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 13:40:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231024194010.99995-2-alexhenrie24@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231024194010.99995-1-alexhenrie24@gmail.com>
If the preferred lifetime was less than the minimum required lifetime,
ipv6_create_tempaddr would error out without creating any new address.
On my machine and network, this error happened immediately with the
preferred lifetime set to 1 second, after a few minutes with the
preferred lifetime set to 4 seconds, and not at all with the preferred
lifetime set to 5 seconds. During my investigation, I found a Stack
Exchange post from another person who seems to have had the same
problem: They stopped getting new addresses if they lowered the
preferred lifetime below 3 seconds, and they didn't really know why.
The preferred lifetime is a preference, not a hard requirement. The
kernel does not strictly forbid new connections on a deprecated address,
nor does it guarantee that the address will be disposed of the instant
its total valid lifetime expires. So rather than disable IPv6 privacy
extensions altogether if the minimum required lifetime swells above the
preferred lifetime, it is more in keeping with the user's intent to
increase the temporary address's lifetime to the minimum necessary for
the current network conditions.
With these fixes, setting the preferred lifetime to 3 or 4 seconds "just
works" because the extra fraction of a second is practically
unnoticeable. It's even possible to reduce the time before deprecation
to 1 or 2 seconds by also disabling duplicate address detection (setting
/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/*/dad_transmits to 0). I realize that that is a
pretty niche use case, but I know at least one person who would gladly
sacrifice performance and convenience to be sure that they are getting
the maximum possible level of privacy.
Link: https://serverfault.com/a/1031168/310447
Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com>
---
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index e51c30d1daff..a1eec8f09594 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -1405,15 +1405,23 @@ static int ipv6_create_tempaddr(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp, bool block)
write_unlock_bh(&idev->lock);
- /* A temporary address is created only if this calculated Preferred
- * Lifetime is greater than REGEN_ADVANCE time units. In particular,
- * an implementation must not create a temporary address with a zero
- * Preferred Lifetime.
+ /* From RFC 4941:
+ *
+ * A temporary address is created only if this calculated Preferred
+ * Lifetime is greater than REGEN_ADVANCE time units. In
+ * particular, an implementation must not create a temporary address
+ * with a zero Preferred Lifetime.
+ *
+ * Clamp the preferred lifetime to a minimum of regen_advance, unless
+ * that would exceed valid_lft.
+ *
* Use age calculation as in addrconf_verify to avoid unnecessary
* temporary addresses being generated.
*/
age = (now - tmp_tstamp + ADDRCONF_TIMER_FUZZ_MINUS) / HZ;
- if (cfg.preferred_lft <= regen_advance + age) {
+ if (cfg.preferred_lft <= regen_advance + age)
+ cfg.preferred_lft = regen_advance + age + 1;
+ if (cfg.preferred_lft > cfg.valid_lft) {
in6_ifa_put(ifp);
in6_dev_put(idev);
ret = -1;
--
2.42.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-24 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-21 1:11 [PATCH] ipv6/addrconf: clamp preferred_lft to the minimum instead of erroring Alex Henrie
2023-08-22 9:54 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-08-23 3:41 ` Alex Henrie
2023-08-23 3:45 ` David Ahern
2023-08-23 8:36 ` Jiri Bohac
2023-08-23 11:00 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-08-29 5:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] net: ipv6/addrconf: ensure that temporary addresses' preferred lifetimes are in the valid range Alex Henrie
2023-08-29 5:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] net: ipv6/addrconf: avoid integer underflow in ipv6_create_tempaddr Alex Henrie
2023-09-01 4:41 ` [PATCH v3] " Alex Henrie
2023-09-01 13:53 ` David Ahern
2023-09-04 6:21 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-08-29 5:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] net: ipv6/addrconf: clamp preferred_lft to the maximum allowed Alex Henrie
2023-08-31 8:25 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-08-29 5:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] net: ipv6/addrconf: clamp preferred_lft to the minimum required Alex Henrie
2023-08-31 1:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-31 5:40 ` Alex Henrie
2023-08-29 5:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] Documentation: networking: explain what happens if temp_valid_lft is too small Alex Henrie
2023-08-29 5:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] Documentation: networking: explain what happens if temp_prefered_lft is too small or too large Alex Henrie
2023-08-31 8:33 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-10-24 19:40 ` [PATCH resend 1/4] net: ipv6/addrconf: clamp preferred_lft to the maximum allowed Alex Henrie
2023-10-24 19:40 ` Alex Henrie [this message]
2023-10-24 19:40 ` [PATCH resend 3/4] Documentation: networking: explain what happens if temp_valid_lft is too small Alex Henrie
2023-10-24 19:40 ` [PATCH resend 4/4] Documentation: networking: explain what happens if temp_prefered_lft is too small or too large Alex Henrie
2023-10-24 19:48 ` [PATCH resend 1/4] net: ipv6/addrconf: clamp preferred_lft to the maximum allowed Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231024194010.99995-2-alexhenrie24@gmail.com \
--to=alexhenrie24@gmail.com \
--cc=benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=hideaki.yoshifuji@miraclelinux.com \
--cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).