From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3B6626E3C for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:25:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jEfUUOJ9" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D304C433C7; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:25:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1698251117; bh=m7No2rfE+Iq89ezChfzYe54dDUPkwPlydza1XqHZYtA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jEfUUOJ98OYDwzq7UpMQUtS96abAU5UwZN0a/NPMQ95xGEIw5eAI5sTE4a/xwIJMi Pk9ItYh9K2Z/1Whebt7oWfuZxkkQFmXr5u8mgd823RIGgEhU1EtSqDQVYlChDMGw1/ GOiu8TfBUFVgH14RHwwlYmdq6bsohf7wTM3Xz9+rux5iNEO01BHVfpONMuZNL+bMfQ nm49QG1XQsgrZiSqduGzssL3DtFDEEVk5DqaWgLeGvy9c3L5NqsfdhULIh2sAL0Eim ChlleWKL/Hvt3me4xY9WjvO/VX1MPZmUqyvdP9qr8nA9umtpueu5GroIIhGifsq/5c /S/bBsVgqiw6A== Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:25:16 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Michal Schmidt Cc: Jacob Keller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller , Wojciech Drewek , Rafal Romanowski Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/9] iavf: in iavf_down, disable queues when removing the driver Message-ID: <20231025092516.3c08dfce@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20231023230826.531858-1-jacob.e.keller@intel.com> <20231023230826.531858-6-jacob.e.keller@intel.com> <20231024164234.46e9bb5f@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 17:24:59 +0200 Michal Schmidt wrote: > > This looks like a 6.6 regression, why send it for net-next? > > Hi Jakub, > At first I thought I had a dependency on the preceding patch in the > series, but after rethinking and retesting it, it's actually fine to > put this patch in net.git. > Can you please do that, or will you require resending? I'd prefer if Jake could resend just the fix for net, after re-testing that it indeed works right. I'll make sure that it makes tomorrow's PR from net, in case the net-next stuff would conflict.