[PATCH net v2] net: sunrpc: Fix an off by one in rpc_sockaddr2uaddr()

[PATCH net v2] net: sunrpc: Fix an off by one in rpc_sockaddr2uaddr()

[Christophe JAILLET]

The intent is to check if the strings' are truncated or not. So, >= should
be used instead of >, because strlcat() and snprintf() return the length of
the output, excluding the trailing NULL.

Fixes: a02d69261134 ("SUNRPC: Provide functions for managing universal addresses")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
---
v2: Fix cut'n'paste typo in subject
    Add net in [PATCH...]
---
 net/sunrpc/addr.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/addr.c b/net/sunrpc/addr.c
index d435bffc6199..97ff11973c49 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/addr.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/addr.c
@@ -284,10 +284,10 @@ char *rpc_sockaddr2uaddr(const struct sockaddr *sap, gfp_t gfp_flags)
 	}
 
 	if (snprintf(portbuf, sizeof(portbuf),
-		     ".%u.%u", port >> 8, port & 0xff) > (int)sizeof(portbuf))
+		     ".%u.%u", port >> 8, port & 0xff) >= (int)sizeof(portbuf))
 		return NULL;
 
-	if (strlcat(addrbuf, portbuf, sizeof(addrbuf)) > sizeof(addrbuf))
+	if (strlcat(addrbuf, portbuf, sizeof(addrbuf)) >= sizeof(addrbuf))
 		return NULL;
 
 	return kstrdup(addrbuf, gfp_flags);
-- 
2.32.0

Re: [PATCH net v2] net: sunrpc: Fix an off by one in rpc_sockaddr2uaddr()

[Benjamin Coddington]

On 24 Oct 2023, at 17:58, Christophe JAILLET wrote:

> The intent is to check if the strings' are truncated or not. So, >= should
> be used instead of >, because strlcat() and snprintf() return the length of
> the output, excluding the trailing NULL.
>
> Fixes: a02d69261134 ("SUNRPC: Provide functions for managing universal addresses")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
> v2: Fix cut'n'paste typo in subject
>     Add net in [PATCH...]
> ---

Reviewed-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>

Ben

Re: [PATCH net v2] net: sunrpc: Fix an off by one in rpc_sockaddr2uaddr()

[Chuck Lever]

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 11:58:20PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> The intent is to check if the strings' are truncated or not. So, >= should
> be used instead of >, because strlcat() and snprintf() return the length of
> the output, excluding the trailing NULL.
> 
> Fixes: a02d69261134 ("SUNRPC: Provide functions for managing universal addresses")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>

Hi Christophe -

Should these two be taken via the NFS client tree or do you intend
to include them in some other tree?


> ---
> v2: Fix cut'n'paste typo in subject
>     Add net in [PATCH...]
> ---
>  net/sunrpc/addr.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/addr.c b/net/sunrpc/addr.c
> index d435bffc6199..97ff11973c49 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/addr.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/addr.c
> @@ -284,10 +284,10 @@ char *rpc_sockaddr2uaddr(const struct sockaddr *sap, gfp_t gfp_flags)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (snprintf(portbuf, sizeof(portbuf),
> -		     ".%u.%u", port >> 8, port & 0xff) > (int)sizeof(portbuf))
> +		     ".%u.%u", port >> 8, port & 0xff) >= (int)sizeof(portbuf))
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	if (strlcat(addrbuf, portbuf, sizeof(addrbuf)) > sizeof(addrbuf))
> +	if (strlcat(addrbuf, portbuf, sizeof(addrbuf)) >= sizeof(addrbuf))
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	return kstrdup(addrbuf, gfp_flags);
> -- 
> 2.32.0
> 

-- 
Chuck Lever

Re: [PATCH net v2] net: sunrpc: Fix an off by one in rpc_sockaddr2uaddr()

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:30:51 -0400 Chuck Lever wrote:
> Should these two be taken via the NFS client tree or do you intend
> to include them in some other tree?

FWIW we're not intending to take these. If only get_maintainer
understood tree designations :(

Re: [PATCH net v2] net: sunrpc: Fix an off by one in rpc_sockaddr2uaddr()

[Dan Carpenter]

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 09:28:29AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:30:51 -0400 Chuck Lever wrote:
> > Should these two be taken via the NFS client tree or do you intend
> > to include them in some other tree?
> 
> FWIW we're not intending to take these. If only get_maintainer
> understood tree designations :(

I accidentally markedt his NFS patch as net on Oct 11 as well.  :/

https://lore.kernel.org/all/356fb42c-9cf1-45cd-9233-ac845c507fb7@moroto.mountain/

regards,
dan carpenter