From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C0161DFC0 for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 17:14:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="iCm/6n4x" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 913D1C433C9; Thu, 2 Nov 2023 17:14:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1698945297; bh=YWbbEndApLhfHNI379/b3+zyDl9cbjdfnITl/KQN1mc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iCm/6n4xyxxzsy2MGw9sH3kQyN/9bdf7PypP1jrN7QxH/AkOhJk/3DWhwrlOMxtre KRhaai6WIZbVuOPmGN1Ogvs5B/ugdLoZjj3IG4Mi6VBoY9lEZWdVWAYQFjkaqFzHdr nQ20r/tbp6cbIiGqaOB2eUJf+u5eM+dHkbvwModKULkbxAbIdteYqvb1FRfWSmVOTl RW/jcNheYpMejJv3JobO8+EO7tHwzJJy87D/eEALM+9Uy/E9bpL9TA9pdXP4k3Dgwt o3TeT5HyDLb2Jv0Eyp0I2xFgsDyofaLiU90JuqT31HQ0FDX9hNFneBWScu7JND87IM CJCsiBQ3RrOjw== Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 10:14:56 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Florian Westphal Cc: Jiri Pirko , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netlink: fill in missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() Message-ID: <20231102101456.66e6419b@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20231102120533.GL6174@breakpoint.cc> References: <20231102045724.2516647-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20231102120533.GL6174@breakpoint.cc> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 13:05:33 +0100 Florian Westphal wrote: > > It's a bit odd to target -net with this, isn't it? I mostly wanted to make sure the build bot still works after we sucked in all the code from Linus. There was no patches getting posted but... > I had planned to fill the missing descriptions for > all netfilter via next nf.git PR as I consider those as > bug fixes. > > Thats the regression risk here? +1 for getting it into net, no regression risk and it's low key annoying to see all these warnings.