From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0758D1944B for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:47:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="RrWC5bCx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FB75C433C7; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:47:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1699462060; bh=2YJ/6GS0bW+n/ACRUP2CWd9dxYR3V9iS4ICGfAuIvOE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RrWC5bCxfSN+g1j47gq7+CkyDhLTtMrljPY30x2qgCDgJr1Tn1LpksM/slKoKEm6x 5DpVU/7/o1xkbJCMrfqdKyjT3GKJSN2Qh3eHvIlRSORc8OxJpgWN0ERns6MK4ewyXo 4LfV97F6PSz5Fg8R7OEsqy92mNJqasFcBbA4Rd8Pfk94fVTwWdSQrJ/ehTPyhFmXbW SfubHLZkQBZoftON6dKHARDBpuOmCuvhwAwy8FRBLoHlhtQqwKZpf+HAGKbAOzg8AM LfVR+ML1fwR+DDVEKGs/IJNtkQntcXj2xS0xD6fXF/p2YIrXUCX50DUxraUxZkNuE9 XyDi/uE/oBMEw== Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 08:47:39 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Yunsheng Lin Cc: , , , , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Ilias Apalodimas Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] page_pool: Add myself as page pool reviewer in MAINTAINERS Message-ID: <20231108084739.59adead6@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <0098508e-59ab-5633-3725-86f1febc1480@huawei.com> References: <20231107123825.61051-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <20231107094959.556ffe53@kernel.org> <0098508e-59ab-5633-3725-86f1febc1480@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 11:31:45 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote: > For 2, yes, maybe I should stick to the rule even if it is a simple > patch and obivous format error. Yes, maybe you should.