[PATCH net] indirect_call_wrapper: Fix typo in INDIRECT_CALL_$NR kerneldoc

[PATCH net] indirect_call_wrapper: Fix typo in INDIRECT_CALL_$NR kerneldoc

[Tobias Klauser]

Fix a small typo in the kerneldoc comment of the INDIRECT_CALL_$NR
macro.

Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
---
 include/linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h b/include/linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h
index c1c76a70a6ce..adb83a42a6b9 100644
--- a/include/linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h
+++ b/include/linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
  *  @__VA_ARGS__: arguments for @f
  *
  * Avoid retpoline overhead for known builtin, checking @f vs each of them and
- * eventually invoking directly the builtin function. The functions are check
+ * eventually invoking directly the builtin function. The functions are checked
  * in the given order. Fallback to the indirect call.
  */
 #define INDIRECT_CALL_1(f, f1, ...)					\
-- 
2.42.0

Re: [PATCH net] indirect_call_wrapper: Fix typo in INDIRECT_CALL_$NR kerneldoc

[Simon Horman]

On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 09:01:17AM +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> Fix a small typo in the kerneldoc comment of the INDIRECT_CALL_$NR
> macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>

Hi Tobias,

I am fine with this change but I don't think it fits the guidelines for
a bug fix. So I think it would be better targeted at net-next.

	Subject: [PATCH net-next] ...

If so, the following applies:

## Form letter - net-next-closed

The merge window for v6.7 has begun and therefore net-next is closed
for new drivers, features, code refactoring and optimizations.
We are currently accepting bug fixes only.

Please repost when net-next reopens after November 12th.

RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.

See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#development-cycle