From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BE4E8F58 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 06:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IjN+hJ0o" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D38BDC433C7; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 06:03:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1700114592; bh=3mqFKUsuT68n/sSTZqcH0Cb8LWIbVDw0n692TohaKl0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IjN+hJ0obX4QdrYRIph8gkaAWwAvWhIAD/DxfdJ8gAmlVJSF/azMgC2Lz25mqb1/j 9bW4kljHbqs17Yu8C3H8HmxjcjIdaCg0tlJLECqbhMOYh2EeaB/Hoyawf5OnYnlJFt nWay1GD6xH0S5dDSLOmLcMCCjgmeTg1aFKwV2NDFmvlR20ZI4Nc7/Z9EZwjFXTFbFD 85Yd/ZVaMUL+DA3k9UGgqRzqCcaioJCIr4ZnHC0GJlc1yecnqZGWCPnkzr1Q1AlY/N eY+TQt2oE4Gt8INaw0JYXCpNFrJ1xwcvYF+dNxDCA+mrcaYUyIaTL6fMDRRxXm/VQ2 GKPGdqdOFMCnw== Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 01:03:10 -0500 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Simon Horman Cc: Tobias Klauser , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] indirect_call_wrapper: Fix typo in INDIRECT_CALL_$NR kerneldoc Message-ID: <20231116010310.4664dd38@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20231115175626.GW74656@kernel.org> References: <20231114104202.4680-1-tklauser@distanz.ch> <20231115175626.GW74656@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 17:56:26 +0000 Simon Horman wrote: > To the netdev maintainers: get_maintainer.pl doesn't seem to > know much about include/linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h. > Should that be fixed? I'm curious how many of such files exist under include/linux. Files which are not really networking specific but only tree the changes ever went thru is netdev.. But yes, in the interest of "taking responsibility" we should probably claim it.