From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Coco Li <lixiaoyan@google.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
Mubashir Adnan Qureshi <mubashirq@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Chao Wu <wwchao@google.com>,
Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>,
Pradeep Nemavat <pnemavat@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 1/5] Documentations: Analyze heavily used Networking related structs
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 17:19:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231120171959.GC245676@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231113233301.1020992-2-lixiaoyan@google.com>
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:32:57PM +0000, Coco Li wrote:
> Analyzed a few structs in the networking stack by looking at variables
> within them that are used in the TCP/IP fast path.
>
> Fast path is defined as TCP path where data is transferred from sender to
> receiver unidirectionally. It doesn't include phases other than
> TCP_ESTABLISHED, nor does it look at error paths.
>
> We hope to re-organizing variables that span many cachelines whose fast
> path variables are also spread out, and this document can help future
> developers keep networking fast path cachelines small.
>
> Optimized_cacheline field is computed as
> (Fastpath_Bytes/L3_cacheline_size_x86), and not the actual organized
> results (see patches to come for these).
>
> Investigation is done on 6.5
>
> Name Struct_Cachelines Cur_fastpath_cache Fastpath_Bytes Optimized_cacheline
> tcp_sock 42 (2664 Bytes) 12 396 8
> net_device 39 (2240 bytes) 12 234 4
> inet_sock 15 (960 bytes) 14 922 14
> Inet_connection_sock 22 (1368 bytes) 18 1166 18
> Netns_ipv4 (sysctls) 12 (768 bytes) 4 77 2
> linux_mib 16 (1060) 6 104 2
>
> Note how there isn't much improvement space for inet_sock and
> Inet_connection_sock because sk and icsk_inet respectively takes up so
> much of the struct that rest of the variables become a small portion of
> the struct size.
>
> So, we decided to reorganize tcp_sock, net_device, Netns_ipv4, linux_mib
>
> Signed-off-by: Coco Li <lixiaoyan@google.com>
> Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
...
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/net_cachelines/index.rst b/Documentation/networking/net_cachelines/index.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..92a6fbe93af35
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/net_cachelines/index.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
Hi Coco,
A minor nit from my side: an SPDX header is probably appropriate at the top
of each .rst file
> +===================================
> +Common Networking Struct Cachelines
> +===================================
> +
> +.. toctree::
> + :maxdepth: 1
> +
> + inet_connection_sock
> + inet_sock
> + net_device
> + netns_ipv4_sysctl
> + snmp
> + tcp_sock
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-20 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-13 23:32 [PATCH v7 net-next 0/5] Analyze and Reorganize core Networking Structs to optimize cacheline consumption Coco Li
2023-11-13 23:32 ` [PATCH v7 net-next 1/5] Documentations: Analyze heavily used Networking related structs Coco Li
2023-11-15 4:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-11-15 7:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-11-15 17:59 ` Coco Li
2023-11-20 17:19 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-11-13 23:32 ` [PATCH v7 net-next 2/5] cache: enforce cache groups Coco Li
2023-11-15 4:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-11-13 23:32 ` [PATCH v7 net-next 3/5] netns-ipv4: reorganize netns_ipv4 fast path variables Coco Li
2023-11-13 23:33 ` [PATCH v7 net-next 4/5] net-device: reorganize net_device " Coco Li
2023-11-16 12:39 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-17 19:44 ` Coco Li
2023-11-20 19:41 ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-11-13 23:33 ` [PATCH v7 net-next 5/5] tcp: reorganize tcp_sock " Coco Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231120171959.GC245676@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lixiaoyan@google.com \
--cc=mubashirq@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pnemavat@google.com \
--cc=weiwan@google.com \
--cc=wwchao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).