From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 07/11] tcp: Factorise cookie req initialisation.
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 10:42:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231121184245.69569-8-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231121184245.69569-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
We will support arbitrary SYN Cookie with BPF, and then some reqsk fields
are initialised in kfunc, and others are done in cookie_v[46]_check().
This patch factorises the common part as cookie_tcp_reqsk_init() and
calls it in cookie_tcp_reqsk_alloc() to minimise the discrepancy between
cookie_v[46]_check().
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
---
net/ipv4/syncookies.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
net/ipv6/syncookies.c | 14 ---------
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/syncookies.c b/net/ipv4/syncookies.c
index 1e3783c97e28..9bca1c026525 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/syncookies.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/syncookies.c
@@ -285,10 +285,44 @@ bool cookie_ecn_ok(const struct tcp_options_received *tcp_opt,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cookie_ecn_ok);
+static int cookie_tcp_reqsk_init(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct request_sock *req)
+{
+ struct inet_request_sock *ireq = inet_rsk(req);
+ struct tcp_request_sock *treq = tcp_rsk(req);
+ const struct tcphdr *th = tcp_hdr(skb);
+
+ req->num_retrans = 0;
+
+ ireq->ir_num = ntohs(th->dest);
+ ireq->ir_rmt_port = th->source;
+ ireq->ir_iif = inet_request_bound_dev_if(sk, skb);
+ ireq->ir_mark = inet_request_mark(sk, skb);
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC))
+ ireq->smc_ok = 0;
+
+ treq->snt_synack = 0;
+ treq->tfo_listener = false;
+ treq->txhash = net_tx_rndhash();
+ treq->rcv_isn = ntohl(th->seq) - 1;
+ treq->snt_isn = ntohl(th->ack_seq) - 1;
+ treq->syn_tos = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ip_dsfield;
+ treq->syn_tos = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ip_dsfield;
+ treq->req_usec_ts = false;
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP)
+ treq->is_mptcp = sk_is_mptcp(sk);
+ if (treq->is_mptcp)
+ return mptcp_subflow_init_cookie_req(req, sk, skb);
+#endif
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
struct request_sock *cookie_tcp_reqsk_alloc(const struct request_sock_ops *ops,
struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- struct tcp_request_sock *treq;
struct request_sock *req;
if (sk_is_mptcp(sk))
@@ -299,22 +333,10 @@ struct request_sock *cookie_tcp_reqsk_alloc(const struct request_sock_ops *ops,
if (!req)
return NULL;
- treq = tcp_rsk(req);
-
- treq->syn_tos = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ip_dsfield;
- treq->req_usec_ts = false;
-
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP)
- treq->is_mptcp = sk_is_mptcp(sk);
- if (treq->is_mptcp) {
- int err = mptcp_subflow_init_cookie_req(req, sk, skb);
-
- if (err) {
- reqsk_free(req);
- return NULL;
- }
+ if (cookie_tcp_reqsk_init(sk, skb, req)) {
+ reqsk_free(req);
+ return NULL;
}
-#endif
return req;
}
@@ -376,28 +398,15 @@ struct sock *cookie_v4_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
ireq = inet_rsk(req);
treq = tcp_rsk(req);
- treq->rcv_isn = ntohl(th->seq) - 1;
- treq->snt_isn = ntohl(th->ack_seq) - 1;
treq->ts_off = tsoff;
- treq->txhash = net_tx_rndhash();
req->mss = mss;
- ireq->ir_num = ntohs(th->dest);
- ireq->ir_rmt_port = th->source;
sk_rcv_saddr_set(req_to_sk(req), ip_hdr(skb)->daddr);
sk_daddr_set(req_to_sk(req), ip_hdr(skb)->saddr);
- ireq->ir_mark = inet_request_mark(sk, skb);
ireq->snd_wscale = tcp_opt.snd_wscale;
ireq->sack_ok = tcp_opt.sack_ok;
ireq->wscale_ok = tcp_opt.wscale_ok;
ireq->tstamp_ok = tcp_opt.saw_tstamp;
req->ts_recent = tcp_opt.saw_tstamp ? tcp_opt.rcv_tsval : 0;
- treq->snt_synack = 0;
- treq->tfo_listener = false;
-
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC))
- ireq->smc_ok = 0;
-
- ireq->ir_iif = inet_request_bound_dev_if(sk, skb);
/* We throwed the options of the initial SYN away, so we hope
* the ACK carries the same options again (see RFC1122 4.2.3.8)
@@ -409,8 +418,6 @@ struct sock *cookie_v4_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
tcp_ao_syncookie(sk, skb, req, AF_INET);
- req->num_retrans = 0;
-
/*
* We need to lookup the route here to get at the correct
* window size. We should better make sure that the window size
diff --git a/net/ipv6/syncookies.c b/net/ipv6/syncookies.c
index 12b1809245f9..e0a9220d1536 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/syncookies.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/syncookies.c
@@ -178,11 +178,8 @@ struct sock *cookie_v6_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
ireq = inet_rsk(req);
treq = tcp_rsk(req);
- treq->tfo_listener = false;
req->mss = mss;
- ireq->ir_rmt_port = th->source;
- ireq->ir_num = ntohs(th->dest);
ireq->ir_v6_rmt_addr = ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr;
ireq->ir_v6_loc_addr = ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr;
@@ -196,31 +193,20 @@ struct sock *cookie_v6_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
ireq->pktopts = skb;
}
- ireq->ir_iif = inet_request_bound_dev_if(sk, skb);
/* So that link locals have meaning */
if (!sk->sk_bound_dev_if &&
ipv6_addr_type(&ireq->ir_v6_rmt_addr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL)
ireq->ir_iif = tcp_v6_iif(skb);
- ireq->ir_mark = inet_request_mark(sk, skb);
-
- req->num_retrans = 0;
ireq->snd_wscale = tcp_opt.snd_wscale;
ireq->sack_ok = tcp_opt.sack_ok;
ireq->wscale_ok = tcp_opt.wscale_ok;
ireq->tstamp_ok = tcp_opt.saw_tstamp;
req->ts_recent = tcp_opt.saw_tstamp ? tcp_opt.rcv_tsval : 0;
- treq->snt_synack = 0;
- treq->rcv_isn = ntohl(th->seq) - 1;
- treq->snt_isn = ntohl(th->ack_seq) - 1;
treq->ts_off = tsoff;
- treq->txhash = net_tx_rndhash();
tcp_ao_syncookie(sk, skb, req, AF_INET6);
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC))
- ireq->smc_ok = 0;
-
/*
* We need to lookup the dst_entry to get the correct window size.
* This is taken from tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock. Somebody please enlighten
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-21 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-21 18:42 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/11] bpf: tcp: Support arbitrary SYN Cookie at TC Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 01/11] tcp: Clean up reverse xmas tree in cookie_v[46]_check() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/11] tcp: Cache sock_net(sk) " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-22 14:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-11-22 18:38 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 03/11] tcp: Clean up goto labels " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 04/11] tcp: Don't pass cookie to __cookie_v[46]_check() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 05/11] tcp: Don't initialise tp->tsoffset in tcp_get_cookie_sock() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 06/11] tcp: Move TCP-AO bits from cookie_v[46]_check() to tcp_ao_syncookie() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 08/11] tcp: Factorise non-BPF SYN Cookie handling Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 09/11] bpf: tcp: Handle BPF SYN Cookie in cookie_v[46]_check() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 10/11] bpf: tcp: Support arbitrary SYN Cookie Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-22 23:19 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-23 0:31 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-27 23:04 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-21 19:01 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 11/11] selftest: bpf: Test bpf_sk_assign_tcp_reqsk() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-23 8:52 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231121184245.69569-8-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).