From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Ivan Babrou <ivan@cloudflare.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/4] af_unix: Run GC on only one CPU.
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 17:47:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231123014747.66063-4-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231123014747.66063-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
If more than 16000 inflight AF_UNIX sockets exist and the garbage
collector is not running, unix_(dgram|stream)_sendmsg() call unix_gc().
Also, they wait for unix_gc() to complete.
In unix_gc(), all inflight AF_UNIX sockets are traversed at least once,
and more if they are the GC candidate. Thus, sendmsg() significantly
slows down with too many inflight AF_UNIX sockets.
There is a small window to invoke multiple unix_gc() instances, which
will then be blocked by the same spinlock except for one.
Let's convert unix_gc() to use struct work so that it will not consume
CPUs unnecessarily.
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
---
net/unix/garbage.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/garbage.c b/net/unix/garbage.c
index 4d634f5f6a55..8bc93a7e745f 100644
--- a/net/unix/garbage.c
+++ b/net/unix/garbage.c
@@ -86,7 +86,9 @@
/* Internal data structures and random procedures: */
static LIST_HEAD(gc_candidates);
-static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(unix_gc_wait);
+
+static void __unix_gc(struct work_struct *work);
+static DECLARE_WORK(unix_gc_work, __unix_gc);
static void scan_inflight(struct sock *x, void (*func)(struct unix_sock *),
struct sk_buff_head *hitlist)
@@ -181,24 +183,22 @@ static void inc_inflight_move_tail(struct unix_sock *u)
list_move_tail(&u->link, &gc_candidates);
}
-static bool gc_in_progress;
#define UNIX_INFLIGHT_TRIGGER_GC 16000
void wait_for_unix_gc(void)
{
- /* If number of inflight sockets is insane,
- * force a garbage collect right now.
+ /* If number of inflight sockets is insane, kick a
+ * garbage collect right now.
* Paired with the WRITE_ONCE() in unix_inflight(),
- * unix_notinflight() and gc_in_progress().
+ * unix_notinflight().
*/
- if (READ_ONCE(unix_tot_inflight) > UNIX_INFLIGHT_TRIGGER_GC &&
- !READ_ONCE(gc_in_progress))
- unix_gc();
- wait_event(unix_gc_wait, gc_in_progress == false);
+ if (READ_ONCE(unix_tot_inflight) > UNIX_INFLIGHT_TRIGGER_GC)
+ queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &unix_gc_work);
+
+ flush_work(&unix_gc_work);
}
-/* The external entry point: unix_gc() */
-void unix_gc(void)
+static void __unix_gc(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct sk_buff *next_skb, *skb;
struct unix_sock *u;
@@ -209,13 +209,6 @@ void unix_gc(void)
spin_lock(&unix_gc_lock);
- /* Avoid a recursive GC. */
- if (gc_in_progress)
- goto out;
-
- /* Paired with READ_ONCE() in wait_for_unix_gc(). */
- WRITE_ONCE(gc_in_progress, true);
-
/* First, select candidates for garbage collection. Only
* in-flight sockets are considered, and from those only ones
* which don't have any external reference.
@@ -319,11 +312,10 @@ void unix_gc(void)
/* All candidates should have been detached by now. */
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&gc_candidates));
- /* Paired with READ_ONCE() in wait_for_unix_gc(). */
- WRITE_ONCE(gc_in_progress, false);
-
- wake_up(&unix_gc_wait);
-
- out:
spin_unlock(&unix_gc_lock);
}
+
+void unix_gc(void)
+{
+ queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &unix_gc_work);
+}
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-23 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-23 1:47 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/4] af_unix: Random improvements for GC Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-23 1:47 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/4] af_unix: Do not use atomic ops for unix_sk(sk)->inflight Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-12-01 9:34 ` Simon Horman
2023-11-23 1:47 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/4] af_unix: Return struct unix_sock from unix_get_socket() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-27 9:08 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-11-27 12:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-12-01 9:35 ` Simon Horman
2023-11-23 1:47 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2023-11-23 1:47 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 4/4] af_unix: Try to run GC async Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-27 9:59 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-11-27 23:00 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-29 0:47 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 0/4] af_unix: Random improvements for GC Ivan Babrou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231123014747.66063-4-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ivan@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).