From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 611574C3CA for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 18:33:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fd9rpg2e" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D8E1C433C7; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 18:33:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1700764398; bh=wf+ar37SNyZQGbz8ggIzfl6+ESKvq2AX3271FYm2brQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fd9rpg2eZ3ZoTyeEWt2gHXBXquJN9xUv0wK+tgFygP5idyb9erUYQBn8lmQtAz8Ty 7mF+BlWIJW2ZdOQdkZiSJknAY6M3Vv+BNPhYIO4rhFyBHFRNZkDUYOfZC0gqiLf0Vy cUS7164//U09aSWjLi89ymQcrVSvDcLPzkiij6NGHrDhOw6YMTRFBOmEnHOer7Izsy W+dAB++Br2vQfiEzXxMK5TrY0d8r0mU5JmA+kbLNvlbHPDwYvcssPzSwzKoLsam5Wy /9G3tKGRYKP44Pw86+ejOKKotFCDhJMwDQ3jsAbe3JDxCucZEmD9ZrC5aNSL0ieGrp PjgRNqiN8FIuw== Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 20:33:14 +0200 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Jiri Pirko , Saeed Mahameed , "David S. Miller" , Paolo Abeni , Eric Dumazet , Saeed Mahameed , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan , Jianbo Liu Subject: Re: [net 09/15] net/mlx5e: Forbid devlink reload if IPSec rules are offloaded Message-ID: <20231123183314.GE4760@unreal> References: <20231122014804.27716-1-saeed@kernel.org> <20231122014804.27716-10-saeed@kernel.org> <20231122093546.GA4760@unreal> <20231122112832.GB4760@unreal> <20231122195332.1eb22597@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231122195332.1eb22597@kernel.org> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:53:32PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 13:28:32 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > Unfortunately not, we (mlx5) were forced by employer of one of > > the netdev maintainers to keep uplink netdev in devlink reload > > while we are in eswitch. > > The way you phrased this makes it sound like employers of netdev > maintainers get to exert power over this community. > > This is an unacceptable insinuation. It will be much beneficial if you stop to seek extra level of meanings in our conversations. There are differences in our ability to express and feel intent in English language. > > DEVLINK_RELOAD_LIMIT_NO_RESET should not cause link loss, sure. > Even if Meta required that you implemented that (which it does > not, AFAIK) - it's just an upstream API. Excellent.