From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E6A237D00 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 16:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="RZt8Gu8W" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F40CC433C8; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 16:08:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1701187734; bh=lcIfSc8SstynVkPEZPUhrQkYMGebylOmH6ZE2Byhoeg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RZt8Gu8WjPsizT79ERo87BEdC1i2n8F+Opf8RfHwpntI/tZm1ejm0/OIlUaDoAGpZ n6+Sb3u4UU5Uox12b8Z8gxgXLinAUiCK3mUxuf9+QYj5vV8ciBIPqE4QgttCzDcr+2 W09VQqcxwmhv4Ezipbvq7uzUKg2cM6BBah5wlhaMTKXCghE5u3VHfe8XIVv0fOGWge Q86HZyoyaQaIjgiCvWMzPnjzMFhd4JGJhMfDChmbENrDW4u95kV+MFq5Ow/rUkAn75 yrTi7UvHPYz+1Oruwy5ptJ3iR1I5wrXQMVLhC7NcE+t9k8D0e9abiV4nZa627oYYrj 08l9W9bJEJxSA== Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 18:08:49 +0200 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Jiri Pirko Cc: Saeed Mahameed , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Eric Dumazet , Saeed Mahameed , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan , Jianbo Liu Subject: Re: [net 09/15] net/mlx5e: Forbid devlink reload if IPSec rules are offloaded Message-ID: <20231128160849.GA6535@unreal> References: <20231122014804.27716-1-saeed@kernel.org> <20231122014804.27716-10-saeed@kernel.org> <20231122093546.GA4760@unreal> <20231122112832.GB4760@unreal> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 01:02:46PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 12:28:32PM CET, leon@kernel.org wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > >> Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 10:35:46AM CET, leon@kernel.org wrote: > >> >On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 10:13:45AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > >> >> Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 02:47:58AM CET, saeed@kernel.org wrote: > >> >> >From: Jianbo Liu > > [...] > > > >while we are in eswitch. It is skipped in lines 1556-1558: > > > > 1548 static void > > 1549 mlx5e_vport_rep_unload(struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep) > > 1550 { > > 1551 struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv = mlx5e_rep_to_rep_priv(rep); > > 1552 struct net_device *netdev = rpriv->netdev; > > 1553 struct mlx5e_priv *priv = netdev_priv(netdev); > > 1554 void *ppriv = priv->ppriv; > > 1555 > > 1556 if (rep->vport == MLX5_VPORT_UPLINK) { > > 1557 mlx5e_vport_uplink_rep_unload(rpriv); > > 1558 goto free_ppriv; > > 1559 } > > Uplink netdev is created and destroyed by a different code: > mlx5e_probe() > mlx5e_remove() > > According to my testing. The uplink netdev is properly removed and > re-added during reload-reinit. What am I missing? You are missing internal profile switch from eswitch to legacy, when you perform driver unload. Feel free to contact me or Jianbo offline if you need more mlx5 specific details. Thanks > > > > > 1560 > > 1561 unregister_netdev(netdev); > > 1562 mlx5e_rep_vnic_reporter_destroy(priv); > > 1563 mlx5e_detach_netdev(priv); > > 1564 priv->profile->cleanup(priv); > > 1565 mlx5e_destroy_netdev(priv); > > 1566 free_ppriv: > > 1567 kvfree(ppriv); /* mlx5e_rep_priv */ > > 1568 } > > > > [...] > >