From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E560374DC for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:45:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="D9VeoTMN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E246DC433C7; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:45:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1701276355; bh=xyGkzJOwryPI3xou4Wa2vHE+sW4/4uqtG68QNchN5LY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=D9VeoTMN7TnMhvL6wfalm6GNQThPs3Snm3mnXssmcl0J1HauRPKtxlU9A7wr+ptQn LuOCmmHpGvxXVtVVmb2ClkCsJ86oHQ9w18MNXtd6n5wQblx4SOVe3gZGJXh1XQZ3xd OzD6VXd59rUJhFpJikhdC3KaIH3nZ90z2Ng5ZsUzSJQ6Fink4Hiv57fnYQGAC03qau RfxfMxu4Qs5ddGtGuzSa3YXEOpT9un53ZJgnbPvtEeeHZwfDh42cHvh8UOcD31F/lA PFWjYWryfH68HVxuQRcwh+hLfCb6RlxIvsmOr1u3Miab6Po18foGpb1+4O8NT190U9 J63vW+f18BY9w== Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:45:51 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Karol Kolacinski Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, Przemek Kitszel Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next] ice: Rename E822 to E82X Message-ID: <20231129164551.GE43811@kernel.org> References: <20231124114555.253412-1-karol.kolacinski@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231124114555.253412-1-karol.kolacinski@intel.com> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:45:55PM +0100, Karol Kolacinski wrote: > When code is applicable for both E822 and E823 devices, rename it from > E822 to E82X. > ICE_PHY_PER_NAC_E822 was unused, so just remove it. > > Signed-off-by: Karol Kolacinski > Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel Hi Karol, while I think this naming scheme may have some shortcomings if other E82[0-9] chips come along with different overlap in function re-use, I also do see that it is a convenient shorthand. And moreover that it matches what is already in-tree as of at least: 88c360e49f51 ("ice: Support cross-timestamping for E823 devices") So, FWIIW, beyond my mumblings here I am happy with this patch. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman