From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA5FACA6F for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 03:19:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Mq64Bb7Q" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33062C433C9; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 03:19:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1701832785; bh=qazZjGvxESECPn7UnTm0gAKB5GVROhpZtoKCBMJdlf8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Mq64Bb7QpK5vWSjzSS9lPdiPM36ZaL19wSEK7MQroYIYFJuFiXXDcEdDEX1ay3/zK dP6WmPwHxxKPX3LQ2t68P3EQkopt9p7RP6pjfFZHXGD6KifWBX/bRPFw15ABM5CM2a MQKqWgbxXKH8mnwnLG78gQCsqPfU0RVKsS2cAS1GR9COmG4vrONfk37E98DqKJmmc/ TEP0qQUC30L8ah9SlnCweZBcLEARgd+1w+BlC7ut7U5OoOQxGogCAfpRa/C38i+3kJ Js6gFOl6wUk+L25rxxWkjuY0aG/d4pz2GROJ4Yaajv1/c2BJ8mk45Z5H4v4mpcU6Cn nn6++EUwtdn/g== Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 19:19:44 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Swarup Laxman Kotiaklapudi , jiri@resnulli.us Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] netlink: specs: devlink: add some(not all) missing attributes in devlink.yaml Message-ID: <20231205191944.6738deb7@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20231202123048.1059412-1-swarupkotikalapudi@gmail.com> References: <20231202123048.1059412-1-swarupkotikalapudi@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 18:00:48 +0530 Swarup Laxman Kotiaklapudi wrote: > Add some missing(not all) attributes in devlink.yaml. Hi Jiri, Do you want to take a closer look at the spec here? Looks fine to me, on a quick scroll. > Suggested-by: Jiri Pirko > Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski > Fixes: f2f9dd164db0 ("netlink: specs: devlink: add the remaining command to generate complete split_ops") I'll drop these when / if applying, FWIW. Swarup, for future reference if there are comments / changes suggested during normal review process you don't have to add the Suggested-by tag. The expectation is that the reviewer will send a Reviewed-by tag themselves at the end instead.