* [PATCH] appletalk: Fix Use-After-Free in atalk_ioctl
@ 2023-12-06 12:09 Hyunwoo Kim
2023-12-07 6:42 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hyunwoo Kim @ 2023-12-06 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, edumazet
Cc: v4bel, imv4bel, kuba, pabeni, horms, dhowells, lukas.bulwahn, mkl,
netdev
Because atalk_ioctl() accesses sk->sk_receive_queue
without holding a sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, it can
cause a race with atalk_recvmsg().
A use-after-free for skb occurs with the following flow.
```
atalk_ioctl() -> skb_peek()
atalk_recvmsg() -> skb_recv_datagram() -> skb_free_datagram()
```
Add sk->sk_receive_queue.lock to atalk_ioctl() to fix this issue.
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@theori.io>
---
net/appletalk/ddp.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/appletalk/ddp.c b/net/appletalk/ddp.c
index 9ba04a69ec2a..f240d5338bc9 100644
--- a/net/appletalk/ddp.c
+++ b/net/appletalk/ddp.c
@@ -1775,15 +1775,16 @@ static int atalk_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
break;
}
case TIOCINQ: {
+ long amount = 0;
/*
* These two are safe on a single CPU system as only
* user tasks fiddle here
*/
+ spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
struct sk_buff *skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
- long amount = 0;
-
if (skb)
amount = skb->len - sizeof(struct ddpehdr);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
rc = put_user(amount, (int __user *)argp);
break;
}
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] appletalk: Fix Use-After-Free in atalk_ioctl
2023-12-06 12:09 [PATCH] appletalk: Fix Use-After-Free in atalk_ioctl Hyunwoo Kim
@ 2023-12-07 6:42 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima @ 2023-12-07 6:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: v4bel
Cc: davem, dhowells, edumazet, horms, imv4bel, kuba, lukas.bulwahn,
mkl, netdev, pabeni, kuniyu
From: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@theori.io>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 04:09:23 -0800
> Because atalk_ioctl() accesses sk->sk_receive_queue
> without holding a sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, it can
> cause a race with atalk_recvmsg().
> A use-after-free for skb occurs with the following flow.
> ```
> atalk_ioctl() -> skb_peek()
> atalk_recvmsg() -> skb_recv_datagram() -> skb_free_datagram()
> ```
> Add sk->sk_receive_queue.lock to atalk_ioctl() to fix this issue.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@theori.io>
> ---
> net/appletalk/ddp.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/appletalk/ddp.c b/net/appletalk/ddp.c
> index 9ba04a69ec2a..f240d5338bc9 100644
> --- a/net/appletalk/ddp.c
> +++ b/net/appletalk/ddp.c
> @@ -1775,15 +1775,16 @@ static int atalk_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> break;
> }
> case TIOCINQ: {
> + long amount = 0;
> /*
> * These two are safe on a single CPU system as only
> * user tasks fiddle here
> */
> + spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
nit: please call spin_lock() after declaring all variables; otherwise
checkpatch.pl will complain.
> struct sk_buff *skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
> - long amount = 0;
Also, please keep the reverse xmas tree.
> -
> if (skb)
> amount = skb->len - sizeof(struct ddpehdr);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
> rc = put_user(amount, (int __user *)argp);
> break;
> }
> --
> 2.25.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-07 6:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-12-06 12:09 [PATCH] appletalk: Fix Use-After-Free in atalk_ioctl Hyunwoo Kim
2023-12-07 6:42 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).