From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@microchip.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 3/3] net: dsa: microchip: Fix PHY loopback configuration for KSZ8794 and KSZ8873
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 06:15:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231207051502.GB1324895@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231207002823.2qx24nxjhn6e43w4@skbuf>
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 02:28:23AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 04:24:26PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > Correct the PHY loopback bit handling in the ksz8_w_phy_bmcr and
> > ksz8_r_phy_bmcr functions for KSZ8794 and KSZ8873 variants in the ksz8795
> > driver. Previously, the code erroneously used Bit 7 of port register 0xD
> > for both chip variants, which is actually for LED configuration. This
> > update ensures the correct registers and bits are used for the PHY
> > loopback feature:
> >
> > - For KSZ8794: Use 0xF / Bit 7.
> > - For KSZ8873: Use 0xD / Bit 0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
>
> How did you find, and how did you test this, and on which one of the switches?
I tested it by using "ethtool -t lanX" command on KSZ8873. Before this
patch the link will stop to work _after_ end of the selftest. The
selftest will fail too.
After this patch, the selftest is passed, except of the TCP test. And
link is working _after_ the selftest,
> Opening the KSZ8873 datasheet, I am confused about their description of
> the "far-end loopback". They make it sound as if this loops the packets
> _received_ from the media side of PHY port A back to the transmit side
> of PHY port A. But the route that these packets take is through the MAC
> of PHY port A, then the switching fabric, then PHY port B which reflects
> them back to PHY port A, where they finally egress.
>
> Actually, they even go as far as saying that if you set the loopback bit
> of port 1, the packets that will be looped back will be from port 2's
> RXP/RXM to TXP/TXM pins, and viceversa.
>
> If true, I believe this isn't the behavior expected by phy_loopback(),
> where the TX signals from the media side of the PHY are looped back into
> the RX side.
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-07 5:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-21 15:24 [PATCH net-next v1 1/3] net: dsa: microchip: ksz8: move BMCR specific code to separate function Oleksij Rempel
2023-11-21 15:24 ` [PATCH net-next v1 2/3] net: dsa: microchip: Remove redundant optimization in ksz8_w_phy_bmcr Oleksij Rempel
2023-11-23 10:54 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-12-06 22:37 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-11-21 15:24 ` [PATCH net-next v1 3/3] net: dsa: microchip: Fix PHY loopback configuration for KSZ8794 and KSZ8873 Oleksij Rempel
2023-11-23 10:52 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-12-06 8:55 ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-12-06 15:14 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-12-06 15:54 ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-12-06 16:43 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-12-07 0:28 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-12-07 5:15 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2023-12-07 14:00 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-12-20 9:46 ` Oleksij Rempel
2023-12-06 16:46 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/3] net: dsa: microchip: ksz8: move BMCR specific code to separate function Vladimir Oltean
2023-12-07 4:57 ` Arun.Ramadoss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231207051502.GB1324895@pengutronix.de \
--to=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arun.ramadoss@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).