Re: [PATCH net-next v9 3/4] vsock: update SO_RCVLOWAT setting callback

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 01:52:50PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> 
> 
> On 14.12.2023 13:29, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 12:19:46PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> >> Do not return if transport callback for SO_RCVLOWAT is set (only in
> >> error case). In this case we don't need to set 'sk_rcvlowat' field in
> >> each transport - only in 'vsock_set_rcvlowat()'. Also, if 'sk_rcvlowat'
> >> is now set only in af_vsock.c, change callback name from 'set_rcvlowat'
> >> to 'notify_set_rcvlowat'.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> >> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Maybe squash this with patch 2/4?
> 
> You mean just do 'git squash' without updating commit message manually?
> 
> Thanks, Arseniy

commit message should reflect all that patch does.

> > 
> >> ---
> >>  Changelog:
> >>  v3 -> v4:
> >>   * Rename 'set_rcvlowat' to 'notify_set_rcvlowat'.
> >>   * Commit message updated.
> >>
> >>  include/net/af_vsock.h           | 2 +-
> >>  net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c         | 9 +++++++--
> >>  net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c | 4 ++--
> >>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
> >> index e302c0e804d0..535701efc1e5 100644
> >> --- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
> >> +++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
> >> @@ -137,7 +137,6 @@ struct vsock_transport {
> >>  	u64 (*stream_rcvhiwat)(struct vsock_sock *);
> >>  	bool (*stream_is_active)(struct vsock_sock *);
> >>  	bool (*stream_allow)(u32 cid, u32 port);
> >> -	int (*set_rcvlowat)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val);
> >>  
> >>  	/* SEQ_PACKET. */
> >>  	ssize_t (*seqpacket_dequeue)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct msghdr *msg,
> >> @@ -168,6 +167,7 @@ struct vsock_transport {
> >>  		struct vsock_transport_send_notify_data *);
> >>  	/* sk_lock held by the caller */
> >>  	void (*notify_buffer_size)(struct vsock_sock *, u64 *);
> >> +	int (*notify_set_rcvlowat)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val);
> >>  
> >>  	/* Shutdown. */
> >>  	int (*shutdown)(struct vsock_sock *, int);
> >> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> >> index 816725af281f..54ba7316f808 100644
> >> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> >> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> >> @@ -2264,8 +2264,13 @@ static int vsock_set_rcvlowat(struct sock *sk, int val)
> >>  
> >>  	transport = vsk->transport;
> >>  
> >> -	if (transport && transport->set_rcvlowat)
> >> -		return transport->set_rcvlowat(vsk, val);
> >> +	if (transport && transport->notify_set_rcvlowat) {
> >> +		int err;
> >> +
> >> +		err = transport->notify_set_rcvlowat(vsk, val);
> >> +		if (err)
> >> +			return err;
> >> +	}
> >>  
> >>  	WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvlowat, val ? : 1);
> >>  	return 0;
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I would s
> > 
> >> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
> >> index 7cb1a9d2cdb4..e2157e387217 100644
> >> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
> >> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
> >> @@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ int hvs_notify_send_post_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, ssize_t written,
> >>  }
> >>  
> >>  static
> >> -int hvs_set_rcvlowat(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val)
> >> +int hvs_notify_set_rcvlowat(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val)
> >>  {
> >>  	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >>  }
> >> @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ static struct vsock_transport hvs_transport = {
> >>  	.notify_send_pre_enqueue  = hvs_notify_send_pre_enqueue,
> >>  	.notify_send_post_enqueue = hvs_notify_send_post_enqueue,
> >>  
> >> -	.set_rcvlowat             = hvs_set_rcvlowat
> >> +	.notify_set_rcvlowat      = hvs_notify_set_rcvlowat
> >>  };
> >>  
> >>  static bool hvs_check_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> >> -- 
> >> 2.25.1
> >