From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3064110D for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 01:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qeYMA2dj" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E044EC433C8; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 01:47:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1702691229; bh=84H98YcSh33wXt1xNDx8TrAJaO6JQefXyhvTmUX7nGI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qeYMA2djtyBpdwicZGXtzetCuBf2AOVUk7t+4IjdUh894pzMD45+BJR976Kcwzvpw QNTT9DEceVyNyHQo66w2ro+cApGSpYtZi0iSySaO83jE2tAwpwUTNZDKO9LqxGVs+6 tGb5j3jx0ytPnc+fvj7l13bVuk9hwp2X73qHAUWrL7qx0RmM37PBUeLhHYkHtYpa7S O/fO8bIF2Pf8GVK/VYiXx9BoGV3YCz7N0KeS6IVSZKQrtUmHwZKRKmPFgJ86n8LnwY qyvJK8ha+BBJXhJVG0EbSiEPI4v7s8Op9pwAhV1xKXfxR5O6rGMxOPZHS/aGgyAePe PqFjAW5s1IwNA== Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 17:47:07 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jiri Pirko Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com, jhs@mojatatu.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, amritha.nambiar@intel.com, sdf@google.com, horms@kernel.org, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com Subject: Re: [patch net-next v7 5/9] genetlink: introduce per-sock family private storage Message-ID: <20231215174707.6ae0a290@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20231214181549.1270696-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <20231214181549.1270696-6-jiri@resnulli.us> <20231214192358.1b150fda@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sorry for the latency... On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 11:17:14 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote: > Wait, let me make your suggestion clear. Do you suggest to remove the > WARN_ON_ONCE from __genl_sk_priv_get() as well? > > To put it in code: > void *__genl_sk_priv_get(struct genl_family *family, struct sock *sk) > { > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!family->sock_privs)) > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > return xa_load(family->sock_privs, (unsigned long) sk); > } I meant this, although no strong feelings. > OR: > void *__genl_sk_priv_get(struct genl_family *family, struct sock *sk) > { > if (!family->sock_privs) > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > return xa_load(family->sock_privs, (unsigned long) sk); > } > ?