From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E073D11CA3; Sat, 23 Dec 2023 13:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="F0USso2l" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4ED9BC433C8; Sat, 23 Dec 2023 13:56:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1703339774; bh=402FMcsFLXTqiwyZScGBRIUGS4WdpQxLxaKJLbakZgo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=F0USso2le2eZ6W5yiS3ameFhrGVcs/wFTu6sS4H3Wgws6f3HZ5DzD48BDmEX8+rN9 syg2nhieCnSpkaqNVqk0JAQ25LR3fAjjemoSbS1pArgN+r+aZrooNJEQG7e3sq9Kro obtuHJ3VclUqZyHYEbkfWoKo2lby9oGtn6zDZSvZM7zC2cOtSI8YlmbdqhHlR8w/TJ reJ0Hn9MeXv5xHTyHflitfMw8Imdiu4hDmINru33Mf8StPuW4LvcJII6YhoSV7E2EE yIiQXCOcqatX9WQA/OGzUMgBlV/SyTx389uNpOZmF0GtV+JUv+rLzgpG2hWqXTgIaA D6w062dsJGdBA== Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 13:56:08 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Sarannya S Cc: quic_bjorande@quicinc.com, andersson@kernel.org, quic_clew@quicinc.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, Manivannan Sadhasivam , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , "open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] net: qrtr: ns: Ignore ENODEV failures in ns Message-ID: <20231223135333.GA201037@kernel.org> References: <1703153211-3717-1-git-send-email-quic_sarannya@quicinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1703153211-3717-1-git-send-email-quic_sarannya@quicinc.com> [Dropped bjorn.andersson@kernel.org, as the correct address seems to be andersson@kernel.org, which is already in the CC list. kernel.org rejected sending this email without that update.] On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 03:36:50PM +0530, Sarannya S wrote: > From: Chris Lew > > Ignore the ENODEV failures returned by kernel_sendmsg(). These errors > indicate that either the local port has been closed or the remote has > gone down. Neither of these scenarios are fatal and will eventually be > handled through packets that are later queued on the control port. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Lew > Signed-off-by: Sarannya Sasikumar > --- > net/qrtr/ns.c | 11 +++++++---- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/qrtr/ns.c b/net/qrtr/ns.c > index abb0c70..8234339 100644 > --- a/net/qrtr/ns.c > +++ b/net/qrtr/ns.c > @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static int service_announce_del(struct sockaddr_qrtr *dest, > msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(*dest); > > ret = kernel_sendmsg(qrtr_ns.sock, &msg, &iv, 1, sizeof(pkt)); > - if (ret < 0) > + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENODEV) > pr_err("failed to announce del service\n"); > > return ret; Hi, The caller of service_announce_del() ignores it's return value. So the only action on error is the pr_err() call above, and so with this patch -ENODEV is indeed ignored. However, I wonder if it would make things clearer to the reader (me?) if the return type of service_announce_del was updated void. Because as things stand -ENODEV may be returned, which implies something might handle that, even though it doe not. The above notwithstanding, this change looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman ...