From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net: ethtool: do runtime PM outside RTNL
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 19:02:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240105190218.5b69b9f5@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZZguXLO3DAX/2Y0/@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 17:29:16 +0100 Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > Removing the rpm calls from the core is just going to lead to a
> > whack-a-mole of bugs in the drivers themselves.
> >
> > IOW I look at the RPM calls in the core as a canary for people
> > doing the wrong thing :(
>
> Hmm, this one I don't understand, what other bugs could pop up
> after reverting bd869245a3dcc and others that added rpm calls
> for the net core?
IDK what igc powers down, but if there's any ndo or ethtool
callback which needs to access a register that requires power
to be resumed - it will deadlock on rtnl exactly the same.
Looking at igc_ethtool I see:
static int igc_ethtool_begin(struct net_device *netdev)
{
struct igc_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
pm_runtime_get_sync(&adapter->pdev->dev);
return 0;
}
static void igc_ethtool_complete(struct net_device *netdev)
{
struct igc_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
pm_runtime_put(&adapter->pdev->dev);
}
so unless we think that returning -ENODEV from all ethtool calls
when cable is not plugged in is okay - removing the PM resume
from the core doesn't buy us much :(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-06 3:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-06 10:39 [PATCH net v3] net: ethtool: do runtime PM outside RTNL Johannes Berg
2023-12-06 16:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-12-06 16:46 ` Johannes Berg
2023-12-06 21:39 ` Marc MERLIN
2023-12-07 10:16 ` Przemek Kitszel
2023-12-07 17:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-12-11 4:52 ` Marc MERLIN
2023-12-15 13:42 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-12-15 17:46 ` Marc MERLIN
2023-12-24 16:30 ` Marc MERLIN
2023-12-24 23:12 ` Heiner Kallweit
2023-12-25 8:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Sasha Neftin
2023-12-25 11:21 ` Marc MERLIN
2024-01-03 10:30 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2024-01-03 11:24 ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-01-03 12:15 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2024-01-03 23:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-01-04 8:25 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2024-01-04 9:05 ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-01-04 16:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-01-05 11:53 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2024-01-05 15:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-01-05 16:29 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2024-01-06 3:02 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-01-08 11:18 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2024-01-05 10:34 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240105190218.5b69b9f5@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=marc@merlins.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).