From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] neighbour: purge nf_bridged skb from foreign device neigh
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 12:15:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240108111504.GA23297@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240108085232.95437-1-ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com>
Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
> An skb can be added to a neigh->arp_queue while waiting for an arp
> reply. Where original skb's skb->dev can be different to neigh's
> neigh->dev. For instance in case of bridging dnated skb from one veth to
> another, the skb would be added to a neigh->arp_queue of the bridge.
>
> There is no explicit mechanism that prevents the original skb->dev link
> of such skb from being freed under us. For instance neigh_flush_dev does
> not cleanup skbs from different device's neigh queue. But that original
> link can be used and lead to crash on e.g. this stack:
>
> arp_process
> neigh_update
> skb = __skb_dequeue(&neigh->arp_queue)
> neigh_resolve_output(..., skb)
> ...
> br_nf_dev_xmit
> br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge_slow
> skb->dev = nf_bridge->physindev
> br_handle_frame_finish
>
> So let's improve neigh_flush_dev to also purge skbs when device
> equal to their skb->nf_bridge->physindev gets destroyed.
Can we fix this by replacing physindev pointer with plain
ifindex instead? There are not too many places that need to
peek into the original net_device struct, so I don't think
the additional dev_get_by_index_rcu() would be an issue.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-08 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-08 8:50 [PATCH] neighbour: purge nf_bridged skb from foreign device neigh Pavel Tikhomirov
2024-01-08 9:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-01-08 11:15 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2024-01-08 11:26 ` Pavel Tikhomirov
2024-01-09 4:57 ` Pavel Tikhomirov
2024-01-09 11:12 ` Florian Westphal
2024-01-10 11:16 ` Pavel Tikhomirov
2024-01-09 5:38 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-09 6:05 ` Pavel Tikhomirov
2024-01-09 9:01 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-09 10:50 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240108111504.GA23297@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernel@openvz.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).