From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacinski@intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 iwl-next 1/6] ice: introduce PTP state machine
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:32:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240115103240.GL392144@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240108124717.1845481-2-karol.kolacinski@intel.com>
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 01:47:12PM +0100, Karol Kolacinski wrote:
Should there be a "From: Jacob" line here to
match the Signed-off-by below?
> Add PTP state machine so that the driver can correctly identify PTP
> state around resets.
> When the driver got information about ungraceful reset, PTP was not
> prepared for reset and it returned error. When this situation occurs,
> prepare PTP before rebuilding its structures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacinski@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Hi Karol and Jacob,
FWIIW, The combination of both a Signed-off-by and Reviewed-by tag from
Jacob seems a little odd to me. If he authored the patch then I would have
gone with the following (along with the From line mentioned above):
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacinski@intel.com>
Otherwise, if he reviewed the patch I would have gone with:
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacinski@intel.com>
...
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c
...
> @@ -2640,6 +2676,16 @@ void ice_ptp_reset(struct ice_pf *pf)
> int err, itr = 1;
> u64 time_diff;
>
> + if (ptp->state != ICE_PTP_RESETTING) {
> + if (ptp->state == ICE_PTP_READY) {
> + ice_ptp_prepare_for_reset(pf);
> + } else {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(pf), "PTP was not initialized\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> + }
nit: perhaps this following is slightly nicer?
(completely untested!)
if (ptp->state == ICE_PTP_READY) {
ice_ptp_prepare_for_reset(pf);
} else if (ptp->state != ICE_PTP_RESETTING) {
err = -EINVAL;
dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(pf), "PTP was not initialized\n");
goto err;
}
> +
> if (test_bit(ICE_PFR_REQ, pf->state) ||
> !ice_pf_src_tmr_owned(pf))
> goto pfr;
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-15 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-08 12:47 [PATCH v5 iwl-next 0/6] ice: fix timestamping in reset process Karol Kolacinski
2024-01-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v5 iwl-next 1/6] ice: introduce PTP state machine Karol Kolacinski
2024-01-12 17:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Pucha, HimasekharX Reddy
2024-01-15 10:32 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-01-17 22:07 ` Keller, Jacob E
2024-01-19 16:55 ` Simon Horman
2024-01-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v5 iwl-next 2/6] ice: pass reset type to PTP reset functions Karol Kolacinski
2024-01-12 17:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Pucha, HimasekharX Reddy
2024-01-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v5 iwl-next 3/6] ice: rename verify_cached to has_ready_bitmap Karol Kolacinski
2024-01-12 17:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Pucha, HimasekharX Reddy
2024-01-15 10:36 ` Simon Horman
2024-01-17 22:10 ` Keller, Jacob E
2024-01-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v5 iwl-next 4/6] ice: rename ice_ptp_tx_cfg_intr Karol Kolacinski
2024-01-12 17:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Pucha, HimasekharX Reddy
2024-01-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v5 iwl-next 5/6] ice: factor out ice_ptp_rebuild_owner() Karol Kolacinski
2024-01-12 17:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Pucha, HimasekharX Reddy
2024-01-15 10:39 ` Simon Horman
2024-01-18 17:36 ` Kolacinski, Karol
2024-01-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v5 iwl-next 6/6] ice: stop destroying and reinitalizing Tx tracker during reset Karol Kolacinski
2024-01-12 17:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Pucha, HimasekharX Reddy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240115103240.GL392144@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=karol.kolacinski@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).