From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f44.google.com (mail-ej1-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73AF11B26E; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 21:42:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="mGwvkKR9" Received: by mail-ej1-f44.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a2c67be31edso516773066b.0; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:42:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705354961; x=1705959761; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=55NEIJBXCpIIIZWtPRCLfdLr/foh8lYBwfef4urHTYE=; b=mGwvkKR9CyPgREa+dshpQK7mBmIdLO1BRl8JG+eKgJej/DYmI4Kbz9PcBdlzHVewM3 dML1GjwLJJos9EzYbhMZXe2IW7942NAGUVhgnf1VnPgIZPTpYcS++KNXMS65EJhFHTGF sWt25Dp14bkeqZDrClo+Gl5R9R0oDZ/z6wrdaMxgbj/DbMzAmjPG0/Ttf+3D07uTZIIG U+iCwyvG5f6FxW4g/PxahqI+BrbJhesfBEZJjir9+tFcKXWuSbKIMDibi1pA1mgdb+o3 7HhomqnoZVCKhU2+51Aq2A8VUNDA20Ayt6eZNloMCT/1kJ21kRN9wZ50IJmq/v28bifQ DXUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705354961; x=1705959761; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=55NEIJBXCpIIIZWtPRCLfdLr/foh8lYBwfef4urHTYE=; b=DzIkSxhnwSA/2727J7NK6ncAv2/ysBh+VEu1HYJ8kXPHa/oae/5ISANLpn6/BJSHCt JkdA4bmqiS5hU+LUio5+0xSuS2355JZfC63ZAuXoPDo8YRM+C7ctQ8wDb4Ujumy/d52N xawAMw4Syp7fCmJRuG+EaGoG0vXvSs++XaG8W7jy/tvb5eMH/gNlDqRUxJWs3OrFV8TZ M5Qmw1blH0+YOY0JtEW7iv/r1gOxcdT3VPIwIUm6UC5Ry8oo//YHleUziHRPlHU2MOAj /bGL4IMJuIob3VKHxftfFlSU6y4HhT9vD0Mo5sFHnLvsdzYd9euPcgVeAyP3jhP4Khb5 U2JA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwgY7CGx+wXA+I0Xze6HIlKniTV7tDIjFgafgihderSb7H/a5Xt VVPUeEuviWWy4yAnR6X25R8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFVXESXnZ5hXNPi66V18lKI+85ApHMSsnxuhoou/MRvRXnGDbW8FPlG037wrslaHLypJx/8dQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d044:b0:a28:1916:6cc9 with SMTP id bo4-20020a170906d04400b00a2819166cc9mr1609989ejb.270.1705354961355; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:42:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from skbuf ([188.25.255.36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kw7-20020a170907770700b00a29dcbe1e72sm5693853ejc.56.2024.01.15.13.42.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:42:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 23:42:38 +0200 From: Vladimir Oltean To: =?utf-8?B?QXLEsW7DpyDDnE5BTA==?= Cc: Daniel Golle , Landen Chao , DENG Qingfang , Sean Wang , Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , mithat.guner@xeront.com, erkin.bozoglu@xeront.com, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 7/8] net: dsa: mt7530: correct port capabilities of MT7988 Message-ID: <20240115214238.bnlvomatududng6l@skbuf> References: <20240113102529.80371-1-arinc.unal@arinc9.com> <20240113102529.80371-8-arinc.unal@arinc9.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20240113102529.80371-8-arinc.unal@arinc9.com> On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 01:25:28PM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote: > On the switch on the MT7988 SoC, there are only 4 PHYs. That's port 0 to 3. > Set the internal phy cases to '0 ... 3'. > > Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL > Acked-by: Daniel Golle > --- For this patch to be obviously correct, please make a statement in the commit message about port 4. It doesn't exist at all?