From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97D6F54FB8; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 16:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705681617; cv=none; b=dYUn48IKDgVMn6S2cVdMrjcizB/sPiYNXqH7OU38Zpt+FAxBuNuYh0AbpyZ4oF9Q2agiVVUHVkbzILTY+BuEthySOCecEbASAJ2GyRADMOA9eISGOauvnHu0A6rExpT3JxoHeMO8SyrWENmA5/PTldNmaITQ7Bb361h/mihLmJw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705681617; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UDkBSfnsj5R5kyHYyJkEIZX2KXRkPcu3b93+iOKGDaU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KD48cjQ/U6dkZXJkxE8mQvQHF64gjyY/NwAX8DBXg6P37Jb6E2FIXbe6C9Fz5Qcc6X8zW8YXKA1JHfguG73MF4eTIjUYdWYu/9uuKuicksXgNaqCks6rT3UYHNB83roWCGtjFYnwxm0UnBt1NY5whE4yXrdGHTgISQs7Huf7fCk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=qrpjNmSw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qrpjNmSw" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B75D4C433F1; Fri, 19 Jan 2024 16:26:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1705681617; bh=UDkBSfnsj5R5kyHYyJkEIZX2KXRkPcu3b93+iOKGDaU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qrpjNmSwdEcjBGZF+t2nesdl5TJr/CSmh8KI0hb6PLu5ydf0TEcPPty6+gQTdx2Xq 8NNvR4bg0yjVCui7BSKw54lvIanCXJ0jCJxPFnsjjCD7X/FHqoLCUTK2zf5BhwBYSQ V9RrSPzEamumdGhRaDRvmNZLyldmbuKoXRAFwTwsL+iXd4nbUGJhnA9JP9iTzYUR44 /QOPRzr3AdyprzeAHcjdDSlwBuJci1wPkzGdYXcNE4xmy/OOosauEkXOf4zwy9Uxtr Nmcs2BUejVYtg7hmwa9wI3yINtlpqVI3bUCmRuXYwlrhLqBEhll8LMoyDQPVBj3glE H7Y7fyyXQED8A== Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 16:26:52 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Dmitry Safonov Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Shuah Khan , Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>, Mohammad Nassiri , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] selftests/net: Argument value mismatch when calling verify_counters() Message-ID: <20240119162652.GG89683@kernel.org> References: <20240118-tcp-ao-test-key-mgmt-v1-0-3583ca147113@arista.com> <20240118-tcp-ao-test-key-mgmt-v1-1-3583ca147113@arista.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240118-tcp-ao-test-key-mgmt-v1-1-3583ca147113@arista.com> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 02:51:34AM +0000, Dmitry Safonov wrote: > From: Mohammad Nassiri > > The end_server() function only operates in the server thread > and always takes an accept socket instead of a listen socket as > its input argument. To align with this, invert the boolean values > used when calling verify_counters() within the end_server() function. Hi Dmitry, I see that this is correct, but I am wondering if it fixes a user-visible bug. If so, could some text about that go here? > > Fixes: 3c3ead555648 ("selftests/net: Add TCP-AO key-management test") > Signed-off-by: Mohammad Nassiri > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/934627c5-eebb-4626-be23-cfb134c01d1a@arista.com/ > [amended 'Fixes' tag and carried-over to lkml] > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov ...