From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1991E5FDA8; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 15:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706023212; cv=none; b=WIGFDOD0Bty7NFfPc9NWPONtK9ZmqjtwDFat+wcdifLwyuP08dNlJb0EoOsj9nZ9AYF6Ov1A+LssQVBwnmZDz9lSEpm+A6D0RvDEhEbcr/9tp0cT2K6BnNCYo6S9Ojn6oI33qaC0baTnGAH9pgW2CW8fxfAosHWUYUjyqTZ5SlU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706023212; c=relaxed/simple; bh=y6Y3q7VymjvJulxs3xYJ+xTFgnItfIvzQuEUfNt7I7k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YJweFSJdsP12M40hj3e2ZjhlvChFhWiHGlGo3D5KhqWaUe1yJYSw2YvaeR26JD2Zb/mXJPumh2JGBJ0WUkD/oh+2+8MKIYYRxrRCEhUeR97vPe6v9opW3sbUyfmCOVkvEZGdesuvvuumZGZDivt8Kl/Cu9C9l7a8lGE5g6TzQq8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XH6IEXcc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XH6IEXcc" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E598C43390; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 15:20:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1706023211; bh=y6Y3q7VymjvJulxs3xYJ+xTFgnItfIvzQuEUfNt7I7k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XH6IEXccyZnsDeFhUQOUUJHiQBLUhIC8PJbd94lKOOS8HkbYIPAOj0ps6V8xYw15p pfnaZZD/3baZtJYfFJqM0lUhDOkMIN+JLoUd46hCdvWKR7ZLvrOvn9hMbo+E3Ksdcq zMuOXxbqgzodoxe8zcyZ74z0glEfwpKmDtKqRVtmesFKzIKGe3y4QG8AMJMrnUXYJr 2XAZkIfCzn+nFqQ9Y4Rz6seii+PMS7BMTjVnPgan29oXMgu9SGPVUgy3BeMQsKch73 bXCGeFrKERNrhL72ZqxNO0q1f1qwXrzjzbrYtazjXn38EW4/PcXR7xstKzlcMuTqDo IsoZF1ZQR3T7w== Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 07:20:10 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Hangbin Liu Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev-driver-reviewers@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [ANN] net-next is OPEN Message-ID: <20240123072010.7be8fb83@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20240122091612.3f1a3e3d@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 16:45:55 +0800 Hangbin Liu wrote: > > Over the merge window I spent some time stringing together selftest > > runner for netdev: https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/status.html > > It is now connected to patchwork, meaning there should be a check > > posted to each patch indicating whether selftests have passed or not. > > Cool! Does it group a couple of patches together and run the tests or > run for each patch separately? It groups all patches outstanding in patchwork (which build cleanly). I'm hoping we could also do HW testing using this setup, so batching is a must. Not 100% sure it's the right direction for SW testing but there's one way to find out :)