From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B00EA81AA5 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 16:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706028726; cv=none; b=oJaucCJDIn+e6QJAIHvLRgpu1+8zxDCsZCeSQGIgRV+IL0YpYvQ6WwRcfj5/qXEvrsYbnf+WlQYq0GPdjxgMqo17iJVV4N2eieqXWrkkpiss7JpFVYYISsMlVRN5J0H2C+9PKY1VFw/fX99WFXGpWOcnRps9o2b3VlIUSw6gIT0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706028726; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/XFOUY3sTDjdatmqc3J67Iy1LW8Lxb4uwFo2mgAnqxo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ExTUuUpI4XzjVlj2PZtBFoA3xfXukUFkI+Ot0fNqMwsXUD0n831rvrBKpwe08evzXr3KmKvnMAeuME1K22qdh3m51UTxj+wTi0xVA48ciPuEYJXQjRX/wuZJy0tO1KXTbpOi4Tegfes6rqwYCTLghNXvsQf8eo491kM7HFJoYbk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=K9c+ekZY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="K9c+ekZY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7C93C433F1; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 16:52:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1706028726; bh=/XFOUY3sTDjdatmqc3J67Iy1LW8Lxb4uwFo2mgAnqxo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=K9c+ekZYEe+Z5rDBPfYCTslbfEdLlvx0LzFLRD3hAs0T+xFconZOe9k6Lodf1Sj2m id1nYStVKBBWQPDFwjzFF2VroeZXAodMN+s1PHHpEeZv49keFkkxNvN+r6anzpiXvl 33Ftdwq5jf9/zY2bfHXPFc/MdLrhPpbGoP3aLQ7JFvS1DwZlsUjkRowRUU5hFGGxS1 hllCCImUAnHaiEv41NyAtaF3Kg9kFDBzzTeRV80NLTMKLYtxF3X31QilnSQ6tdd2Du KHEKiYsJGpo9mcBoy5tBa8IluYlP3llpxNVHO8oECzfcynrrVhTedOJh78Qbg+FKnZ lZHA+nJD+aVPA== Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 16:52:02 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Karol Kolacinski Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, Jacob Keller Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 iwl-next 4/7] ice: don't check has_ready_bitmap in E810 functions Message-ID: <20240123165202.GJ254773@kernel.org> References: <20240123105131.2842935-1-karol.kolacinski@intel.com> <20240123105131.2842935-5-karol.kolacinski@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240123105131.2842935-5-karol.kolacinski@intel.com> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:51:28AM +0100, Karol Kolacinski wrote: > From: Jacob Keller > > E810 hardware does not have a Tx timestamp ready bitmap. Don't check > has_ready_bitmap in E810-specific functions. > Add has_ready_bitmap check in ice_ptp_process_tx_tstamp() to stop > relying on the fact that ice_get_phy_tx_tstamp_ready() returns all 1s. > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller > Signed-off-by: Karol Kolacinski > Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller Reviewed-by: Simon Horman