From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A295D7CF22; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:22:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706113377; cv=none; b=IrfhccKRe4oQj1wNkbjfk2oXw2gRLcZg954WNhOW8SAnrk8F6GmqAv/u6jGDU9yRm1N4cwsFahqnjAX0Ev39GU+pA5hgwS0bvMWz/0niB7pyFo9bJsNUolL91cejKG2O8NNN27gbXAdDcMXSl1J2m/4CWek/jHFZkTw8HxshA5o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706113377; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ARMOd4c5hLEULlHQs+isp/MiD5vLVcM/OwLD6pl5n2k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JoyXgGv6VX8vA7TBkNbe1d+VK5kpY7wt71qtfUldVayuQ9hwnBU6uk5YQKQ2V7hbGSIlfjA6BPv1xW8bPrqAHgQnCc/yJ2B+A83MvJj9sZdCQA2U6VFc5djeeoaTap4tP7MamAfnMES+0uR8P1HrSTpfWPpVXK9l0+/1YD4UYOI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=snEVuu9u; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="snEVuu9u" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7B69C433F1; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:22:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1706113377; bh=ARMOd4c5hLEULlHQs+isp/MiD5vLVcM/OwLD6pl5n2k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=snEVuu9u4JcPwas0vGvzvXBc2VMUr+kL2JhdY+UaQcAfaR9H/buP9XXpjSEFos5eF pcTv5pj4XfcjCk9Q8YSK/GvhuKY2cueq/2Hkb5824EvNZ8OlOXb1m39Zw1Uo9YlZyz ca0nLLVlapia3OvKDyehdJr1P1Hj/3dAmODBaH4XKz5hBBkXOHF/YICZ87zj9TwWRu k5KG76HQLnIuSByYPrRDGONrceg9skneNq/0vYtZUjiiFYcBjEwVOMMlVBlLXl38sC Rxk+HkHoMeujQjA/JfYxlS4dW8rJDfIU7laru5II07xIJBUEdVQW6uiWGjSNbWybqD ektV5d0jOvqsA== Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 08:22:55 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Willem de Bruijn Cc: David Ahern , Hangbin Liu , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev-driver-reviewers@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [ANN] net-next is OPEN Message-ID: <20240124082255.7c8f7c55@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <65b133e83f53e_225ba129414@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> References: <20240122091612.3f1a3e3d@kernel.org> <20240123072010.7be8fb83@kernel.org> <65b133e83f53e_225ba129414@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:59:36 -0500 Willem de Bruijn wrote: > David Ahern wrote: > > On 1/23/24 8:20 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > It groups all patches outstanding in patchwork (which build cleanly). > > > I'm hoping we could also do HW testing using this setup, so batching > > > is a must. Not 100% sure it's the right direction for SW testing but > > > there's one way to find out :) > > > > > > > Really cool. Thanks for spending time to make this happen. > > Just to add to the choir: this is fantastic, thanks! > > Hopefully it will encourage people to add kselftests, kunit tests or > other kinds that now get continuous coverage. Fingers crossed :) > Going through the failing ksft-net series on > https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/status.html, all the tests I'm > responsible seem to be passing. Here's a more handy link filtered down to failures (clicking on the test counts links here): https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?branch=net-next-2024-01-24--15-00&executor=vmksft-net-mp&pass=0 I have been attributing the udpg[rs]o and timestamp tests to you, but I haven't actually checked.. are they not yours? :)