From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the mm tree
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:16:05 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240124121605.1c4cc5bc@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 831 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst
between commit:
0d57063bef1b ("selftests/bpf: update LLVM Phabricator links")
from the mm-nonmm-unstable branch of the mm tree and commit:
f067074bafd5 ("selftests/bpf: Update LLVM Phabricator links")
from the bpf-next tree.
I fixed it up (the latter has one more digit in a SHA1 in a URL, so
I used that) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as
far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be
mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2024-01-24 1:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-24 1:16 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2024-01-24 1:18 ` linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the mm tree Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-24 8:18 ` Andrew Morton
2024-01-24 9:46 ` Daniel Borkmann
2024-01-24 15:34 ` Alexei Starovoitov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-11 1:04 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-11 13:30 ` Luiz Capitulino
2025-03-11 13:33 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-03-30 23:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-31 14:19 ` Luiz Capitulino
2025-03-31 14:25 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240124121605.1c4cc5bc@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).