From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 net-next 2/2] af_unix: Don't hold client's sk_peer_lock in copy_peercred().
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 02:37:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240128103732.18185-3-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240128103732.18185-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
When (AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM) socket connect()s to a listening socket,
the listener's sk_peer_pid/sk_peer_cred are copied to the client in
copy_peercred().
Then, two sk_peer_locks are held there; one is client's and another
is listener's. However, we need not hold the client's lock.
The only place where the client's sk_peer_pid/sk_peer_cred are set
is copy_peercred(), and once they are set, they never change.
Let's not hold client's sk_peer_lock in copy_peercred().
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
---
net/unix/af_unix.c | 20 ++------------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index f07374d31f7c..c5c292393be8 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -706,26 +706,10 @@ static void update_peercred(struct sock *sk)
static void copy_peercred(struct sock *sk, struct sock *peersk)
{
- const struct cred *old_cred;
- struct pid *old_pid;
-
- if (sk < peersk) {
- spin_lock(&sk->sk_peer_lock);
- spin_lock_nested(&peersk->sk_peer_lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
- } else {
- spin_lock(&peersk->sk_peer_lock);
- spin_lock_nested(&sk->sk_peer_lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
- }
- old_pid = sk->sk_peer_pid;
- old_cred = sk->sk_peer_cred;
- sk->sk_peer_pid = get_pid(peersk->sk_peer_pid);
+ spin_lock(&peersk->sk_peer_lock);
+ sk->sk_peer_pid = get_pid(peersk->sk_peer_pid);
sk->sk_peer_cred = get_cred(peersk->sk_peer_cred);
-
- spin_unlock(&sk->sk_peer_lock);
spin_unlock(&peersk->sk_peer_lock);
-
- put_pid(old_pid);
- put_cred(old_cred);
}
static int unix_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog)
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-28 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-28 10:37 [PATCH v1 net-next 0/2] af_unix: Clean up unnecessary spin_lock(&sk->sk_peer_lock) Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-01-28 10:37 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 1/2] af_unix: Set sk_peer_pid/sk_peer_cred locklessly for new socket Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-01-28 10:37 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2024-01-28 21:04 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 2/2] af_unix: Don't hold client's sk_peer_lock in copy_peercred() Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240128103732.18185-3-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).