From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
Cc: edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: tcp: accept old ack during closing
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:01:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240129110108.GK401354@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240126040519.1846345-1-menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 12:05:19PM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote:
> For now, the packet with an old ack is not accepted if we are in
> FIN_WAIT1 state, which can cause retransmission. Taking the following
> case as an example:
>
> Client Server
> | |
> FIN_WAIT1(Send FIN, seq=10) FIN_WAIT1(Send FIN, seq=20, ack=10)
> | |
> | Send ACK(seq=21, ack=11)
> Recv ACK(seq=21, ack=11)
> |
> Recv FIN(seq=20, ack=10)
>
> In the case above, simultaneous close is happening, and the FIN and ACK
> packet that send from the server is out of order. Then, the FIN will be
> dropped by the client, as it has an old ack. Then, the server has to
> retransmit the FIN, which can cause delay if the server has set the
> SO_LINGER on the socket.
>
> Old ack is accepted in the ESTABLISHED and TIME_WAIT state, and I think
> it should be better to keep the same logic.
>
> In this commit, we accept old ack in FIN_WAIT1/FIN_WAIT2/CLOSING/LAST_ACK
> states. Maybe we should limit it to FIN_WAIT1 for now?
>
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - fix unsigned/signed compare error
Thanks for the update.
I wish this could be done without a cast.
But I do see that what you have done is
consistent with at least one other use of tcp_ack().
So from that point of view:
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-29 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-26 4:05 [PATCH net-next v3] net: tcp: accept old ack during closing Menglong Dong
2024-01-29 11:01 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-01-29 12:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-01-30 2:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240129110108.GK401354@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).