From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E35BE364A9; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 02:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706580529; cv=none; b=SrnYWWYuwdt//OPFE+GZLIbRBKQPdsM+L0GjvuUpS4R15+GSYRUjX6+K8zfPlufUR/E5vsdYSlcciC9qJ3gn559secdjWrP3tqQSJFowqPChrVIFRNBumye4ghrSJJM253mKEWuQgHNpjLx6dA5u+aqW2H08SBUrKsPSHEgG0Qw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706580529; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9rbN2HvYm15Z2jwGzV6r+HBEJq7Isl2UPLyDTEbxcjM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gdP2KmYgF+4aYCE9NAH7urAPMhnusF56Es2mvrFizOiqYLaKpgwQtKf9gLJgqil8VxR9gjU0MKHGR4Mcbdd0fzhO46KOiV0Ig9lHwy+0BUPAB3oGJWHtfJxN9ZTnrJriV8S0b0IAjv0guS5FZl8jvKbcJ7wZasBd74XBVu6aQ+E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UBVG57rU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UBVG57rU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C41EFC433F1; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 02:08:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1706580528; bh=9rbN2HvYm15Z2jwGzV6r+HBEJq7Isl2UPLyDTEbxcjM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UBVG57rUvVFDePmvUcPAd+PIDQANfElIL1ePro+BBViUpKJ/HTkpE5y+oZ5Eukrt/ JEm+qIOOGnDf4jqxB0kqK0pwNOnwBMYtM47azf4GIKyw02aZWYbbo5ii6kTZ/xOr6h XDK+vHOhHR34NJZowx5ckdxhcA6Fugqk1iJJsmIGwBtg9uOv+tV85O0BgrzviuGV2k OskNhrEDxptrz3K75gqGAAq7rE2Zf10aOoKBQ8yI7BUIcsZEKuYQNsY2dGg7ug3q43 1/L811yqtyystB+COy/Ta3HfQP9suund893FsdIQa35x/kdQWOEnJ8XSDN9h8wKPiU 4CPcffBZb8jeA== Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:08:46 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Yunsheng Lin Cc: , , , , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , , , , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] remove page frag implementation in vhost_net Message-ID: <20240129180846.28937389@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <65eb8581-5cd8-8759-d598-c6711608b0c7@huawei.com> References: <20240123104250.9103-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <65eb8581-5cd8-8759-d598-c6711608b0c7@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 20:40:37 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote: > Is this patchset supposed to go through vhost tree instead of net-next? > As the state is changed to 'Not applicable' in the netdevbpf patchwork, > according to maintainer-netdev.rst: > > Not applicable patch is expected to be applied outside of the networking > subsystem Sorry about the confusion, DaveM changed the way he uses the states since they were documented. There were concurrent changes to the gve driver, patches no longer apply. Could you rebase?