From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] xen-netback: properly sync TX responses
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 16:23:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240131162336.7d3ba09e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <980c6c3d-e10e-4459-8565-e8fbde122f00@suse.com>
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 14:03:08 +0100 Jan Beulich wrote:
> Invoking the make_tx_response() / push_tx_responses() pair with no lock
> held would be acceptable only if all such invocations happened from the
> same context (NAPI instance or dealloc thread). Since this isn't the
> case, and since the interface "spec" also doesn't demand that multicast
> operations may only be performed with no in-flight transmits,
> MCAST_{ADD,DEL} processing also needs to acquire the response lock
> around the invocations.
>
> To prevent similar mistakes going forward, "downgrade" the present
> functions to private helpers of just the two remaining ones using them
> directly, with no forward declarations anymore. This involves renaming
> what so far was make_tx_response(), for the new function of that name
> to serve the new (wrapper) purpose.
>
> While there,
> - constify the txp parameters,
> - correct xenvif_idx_release()'s status parameter's type,
> - rename {,_}make_tx_response()'s status parameters for consistency with
> xenvif_idx_release()'s.
Hi Paul, is this one on your TODO list to review or should
we do our best? :)
--
pw-bot: needs-ack
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-01 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-29 13:03 [PATCH net] xen-netback: properly sync TX responses Jan Beulich
2024-02-01 0:23 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-02-01 15:43 ` Paul Durrant
2024-02-01 16:10 ` Paul Durrant
2024-02-01 16:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240131162336.7d3ba09e@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@xen.org \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).