netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com,
	david.e.box@linux.intel.com,
	sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] platform/x86/intel/sdsi: Combine read and write mailbox flows
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:07:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240201010747.471141-3-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240201010747.471141-1-david.e.box@linux.intel.com>

The current mailbox commands are either read-only or write-only and the
flow is different for each. New commands will need to send and receive
data. In preparation for these commands, create a common polling function
to handle sending data and receiving in the same transaction.

Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/intel/sdsi.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/sdsi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/sdsi.c
index a70c071de6e2..05a35f2f85b6 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/sdsi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/sdsi.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <linux/iopoll.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/overflow.h>
 #include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/sysfs.h>
@@ -156,8 +157,8 @@ static int sdsi_status_to_errno(u32 status)
 	}
 }
 
-static int sdsi_mbox_cmd_read(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info,
-			      size_t *data_size)
+static int sdsi_mbox_poll(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info,
+			  size_t *data_size)
 {
 	struct device *dev = priv->dev;
 	u32 total, loop, eom, status, message_size;
@@ -166,18 +167,10 @@ static int sdsi_mbox_cmd_read(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *inf
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&priv->mb_lock);
 
-	/* Format and send the read command */
-	control = FIELD_PREP(CTRL_EOM, 1) |
-		  FIELD_PREP(CTRL_SOM, 1) |
-		  FIELD_PREP(CTRL_RUN_BUSY, 1) |
-		  FIELD_PREP(CTRL_PACKET_SIZE, info->size);
-	writeq(control, priv->control_addr);
-
 	/* For reads, data sizes that are larger than the mailbox size are read in packets. */
 	total = 0;
 	loop = 0;
 	do {
-		void *buf = info->buffer + (SDSI_SIZE_MAILBOX * loop);
 		u32 packet_size;
 
 		/* Poll on ready bit */
@@ -195,6 +188,11 @@ static int sdsi_mbox_cmd_read(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *inf
 		if (ret)
 			break;
 
+		if (!packet_size) {
+			sdsi_complete_transaction(priv);
+			break;
+		}
+
 		/* Only the last packet can be less than the mailbox size. */
 		if (!eom && packet_size != SDSI_SIZE_MAILBOX) {
 			dev_err(dev, "Invalid packet size\n");
@@ -208,9 +206,13 @@ static int sdsi_mbox_cmd_read(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *inf
 			break;
 		}
 
-		sdsi_memcpy64_fromio(buf, priv->mbox_addr, round_up(packet_size, SDSI_SIZE_CMD));
+		if (packet_size && info->buffer) {
+			void *buf = info->buffer + array_size(SDSI_SIZE_MAILBOX, loop);
 
-		total += packet_size;
+			sdsi_memcpy64_fromio(buf, priv->mbox_addr,
+					     round_up(packet_size, SDSI_SIZE_CMD));
+			total += packet_size;
+		}
 
 		sdsi_complete_transaction(priv);
 	} while (!eom && ++loop < MBOX_MAX_PACKETS);
@@ -230,16 +232,33 @@ static int sdsi_mbox_cmd_read(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *inf
 		dev_warn(dev, "Read count %u differs from expected count %u\n",
 			 total, message_size);
 
-	*data_size = total;
+	if (data_size)
+		*data_size = total;
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int sdsi_mbox_cmd_write(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info)
+static int sdsi_mbox_cmd_read(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info,
+			      size_t *data_size)
+{
+	u64 control;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&priv->mb_lock);
+
+	/* Format and send the read command */
+	control = FIELD_PREP(CTRL_EOM, 1) |
+		  FIELD_PREP(CTRL_SOM, 1) |
+		  FIELD_PREP(CTRL_RUN_BUSY, 1) |
+		  FIELD_PREP(CTRL_PACKET_SIZE, info->size);
+	writeq(control, priv->control_addr);
+
+	return sdsi_mbox_poll(priv, info, data_size);
+}
+
+static int sdsi_mbox_cmd_write(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info,
+			       size_t *data_size)
 {
 	u64 control;
-	u32 status;
-	int ret;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&priv->mb_lock);
 
@@ -256,20 +275,7 @@ static int sdsi_mbox_cmd_write(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *in
 		  FIELD_PREP(CTRL_PACKET_SIZE, info->size);
 	writeq(control, priv->control_addr);
 
-	/* Poll on ready bit */
-	ret = readq_poll_timeout(priv->control_addr, control, control & CTRL_READY,
-				 MBOX_POLLING_PERIOD_US, MBOX_TIMEOUT_US);
-
-	if (ret)
-		goto release_mbox;
-
-	status = FIELD_GET(CTRL_STATUS, control);
-	ret = sdsi_status_to_errno(status);
-
-release_mbox:
-	sdsi_complete_transaction(priv);
-
-	return ret;
+	return sdsi_mbox_poll(priv, info, data_size);
 }
 
 static int sdsi_mbox_acquire(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info)
@@ -313,7 +319,8 @@ static int sdsi_mbox_acquire(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int sdsi_mbox_write(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info)
+static int sdsi_mbox_write(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info,
+			   size_t *data_size)
 {
 	int ret;
 
@@ -323,7 +330,7 @@ static int sdsi_mbox_write(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	return sdsi_mbox_cmd_write(priv, info);
+	return sdsi_mbox_cmd_write(priv, info, data_size);
 }
 
 static int sdsi_mbox_read(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info, size_t *data_size)
@@ -342,7 +349,7 @@ static int sdsi_mbox_read(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info, s
 static ssize_t sdsi_provision(struct sdsi_priv *priv, char *buf, size_t count,
 			      enum sdsi_command command)
 {
-	struct sdsi_mbox_info info;
+	struct sdsi_mbox_info info = {};
 	int ret;
 
 	if (count > (SDSI_SIZE_WRITE_MSG - SDSI_SIZE_CMD))
@@ -364,7 +371,9 @@ static ssize_t sdsi_provision(struct sdsi_priv *priv, char *buf, size_t count,
 	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&priv->mb_lock);
 	if (ret)
 		goto free_payload;
-	ret = sdsi_mbox_write(priv, &info);
+
+	ret = sdsi_mbox_write(priv, &info, NULL);
+
 	mutex_unlock(&priv->mb_lock);
 
 free_payload:
@@ -408,7 +417,7 @@ static ssize_t
 certificate_read(u64 command, struct sdsi_priv *priv, char *buf, loff_t off,
 		 size_t count)
 {
-	struct sdsi_mbox_info info;
+	struct sdsi_mbox_info info = {};
 	size_t size;
 	int ret;
 
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-01  1:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-01  1:07 [PATCH 0/8] Intel On Demand: Add netlink interface for SPDM attestation David E. Box
2024-02-01  1:07 ` [PATCH 1/8] platform/x86/intel/sdsi: Set message size during writes David E. Box
2024-02-01 16:49   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-02-08 13:42   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-02-08 21:49   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-02-01  1:07 ` David E. Box [this message]
2024-02-01 17:31   ` [PATCH 2/8] platform/x86/intel/sdsi: Combine read and write mailbox flows Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-02-01 18:11     ` David E. Box
2024-02-08 13:38   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-02-01  1:07 ` [PATCH 3/8] platform/x86/intel/sdsi: Add header file David E. Box
2024-02-08 13:41   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-02-08 21:52   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-02-01  1:07 ` [PATCH 4/8] platform/x86/intel/sdsi: Add netlink SPDM transport David E. Box
2024-02-01  9:26   ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-01 16:42     ` David E. Box
2024-02-01 18:00       ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-01  1:07 ` [PATCH 5/8] platform/x86/intel/sdsi: Add in-band BIOS lock support David E. Box
2024-02-08 13:52   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-02-01  1:07 ` [PATCH 6/8] platform/x86/intel/sdsi: Add attribute to read the current meter state David E. Box
2024-02-08 14:43   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-02-01  1:07 ` [PATCH 7/8] tools: Fix errors in meter_certificate display David E. Box
2024-02-08 14:46   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-02-01  1:07 ` [PATCH 8/8] tools: intel_sdsi: Add current meter support David E. Box
2024-02-08 14:52   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-02-01  3:49 ` [PATCH 0/8] Intel On Demand: Add netlink interface for SPDM attestation Stephen Hemminger
2024-02-01 16:53 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-02-02  1:42   ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240201010747.471141-3-david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
    --to=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).