From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com,
david.e.box@linux.intel.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] platform/x86/intel/sdsi: Combine read and write mailbox flows
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 17:07:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240201010747.471141-3-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240201010747.471141-1-david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
The current mailbox commands are either read-only or write-only and the
flow is different for each. New commands will need to send and receive
data. In preparation for these commands, create a common polling function
to handle sending data and receiving in the same transaction.
Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/intel/sdsi.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/sdsi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/sdsi.c
index a70c071de6e2..05a35f2f85b6 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/sdsi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/sdsi.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/iopoll.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/overflow.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/sysfs.h>
@@ -156,8 +157,8 @@ static int sdsi_status_to_errno(u32 status)
}
}
-static int sdsi_mbox_cmd_read(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info,
- size_t *data_size)
+static int sdsi_mbox_poll(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info,
+ size_t *data_size)
{
struct device *dev = priv->dev;
u32 total, loop, eom, status, message_size;
@@ -166,18 +167,10 @@ static int sdsi_mbox_cmd_read(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *inf
lockdep_assert_held(&priv->mb_lock);
- /* Format and send the read command */
- control = FIELD_PREP(CTRL_EOM, 1) |
- FIELD_PREP(CTRL_SOM, 1) |
- FIELD_PREP(CTRL_RUN_BUSY, 1) |
- FIELD_PREP(CTRL_PACKET_SIZE, info->size);
- writeq(control, priv->control_addr);
-
/* For reads, data sizes that are larger than the mailbox size are read in packets. */
total = 0;
loop = 0;
do {
- void *buf = info->buffer + (SDSI_SIZE_MAILBOX * loop);
u32 packet_size;
/* Poll on ready bit */
@@ -195,6 +188,11 @@ static int sdsi_mbox_cmd_read(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *inf
if (ret)
break;
+ if (!packet_size) {
+ sdsi_complete_transaction(priv);
+ break;
+ }
+
/* Only the last packet can be less than the mailbox size. */
if (!eom && packet_size != SDSI_SIZE_MAILBOX) {
dev_err(dev, "Invalid packet size\n");
@@ -208,9 +206,13 @@ static int sdsi_mbox_cmd_read(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *inf
break;
}
- sdsi_memcpy64_fromio(buf, priv->mbox_addr, round_up(packet_size, SDSI_SIZE_CMD));
+ if (packet_size && info->buffer) {
+ void *buf = info->buffer + array_size(SDSI_SIZE_MAILBOX, loop);
- total += packet_size;
+ sdsi_memcpy64_fromio(buf, priv->mbox_addr,
+ round_up(packet_size, SDSI_SIZE_CMD));
+ total += packet_size;
+ }
sdsi_complete_transaction(priv);
} while (!eom && ++loop < MBOX_MAX_PACKETS);
@@ -230,16 +232,33 @@ static int sdsi_mbox_cmd_read(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *inf
dev_warn(dev, "Read count %u differs from expected count %u\n",
total, message_size);
- *data_size = total;
+ if (data_size)
+ *data_size = total;
return 0;
}
-static int sdsi_mbox_cmd_write(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info)
+static int sdsi_mbox_cmd_read(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info,
+ size_t *data_size)
+{
+ u64 control;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&priv->mb_lock);
+
+ /* Format and send the read command */
+ control = FIELD_PREP(CTRL_EOM, 1) |
+ FIELD_PREP(CTRL_SOM, 1) |
+ FIELD_PREP(CTRL_RUN_BUSY, 1) |
+ FIELD_PREP(CTRL_PACKET_SIZE, info->size);
+ writeq(control, priv->control_addr);
+
+ return sdsi_mbox_poll(priv, info, data_size);
+}
+
+static int sdsi_mbox_cmd_write(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info,
+ size_t *data_size)
{
u64 control;
- u32 status;
- int ret;
lockdep_assert_held(&priv->mb_lock);
@@ -256,20 +275,7 @@ static int sdsi_mbox_cmd_write(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *in
FIELD_PREP(CTRL_PACKET_SIZE, info->size);
writeq(control, priv->control_addr);
- /* Poll on ready bit */
- ret = readq_poll_timeout(priv->control_addr, control, control & CTRL_READY,
- MBOX_POLLING_PERIOD_US, MBOX_TIMEOUT_US);
-
- if (ret)
- goto release_mbox;
-
- status = FIELD_GET(CTRL_STATUS, control);
- ret = sdsi_status_to_errno(status);
-
-release_mbox:
- sdsi_complete_transaction(priv);
-
- return ret;
+ return sdsi_mbox_poll(priv, info, data_size);
}
static int sdsi_mbox_acquire(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info)
@@ -313,7 +319,8 @@ static int sdsi_mbox_acquire(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info
return ret;
}
-static int sdsi_mbox_write(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info)
+static int sdsi_mbox_write(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info,
+ size_t *data_size)
{
int ret;
@@ -323,7 +330,7 @@ static int sdsi_mbox_write(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info)
if (ret)
return ret;
- return sdsi_mbox_cmd_write(priv, info);
+ return sdsi_mbox_cmd_write(priv, info, data_size);
}
static int sdsi_mbox_read(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info, size_t *data_size)
@@ -342,7 +349,7 @@ static int sdsi_mbox_read(struct sdsi_priv *priv, struct sdsi_mbox_info *info, s
static ssize_t sdsi_provision(struct sdsi_priv *priv, char *buf, size_t count,
enum sdsi_command command)
{
- struct sdsi_mbox_info info;
+ struct sdsi_mbox_info info = {};
int ret;
if (count > (SDSI_SIZE_WRITE_MSG - SDSI_SIZE_CMD))
@@ -364,7 +371,9 @@ static ssize_t sdsi_provision(struct sdsi_priv *priv, char *buf, size_t count,
ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&priv->mb_lock);
if (ret)
goto free_payload;
- ret = sdsi_mbox_write(priv, &info);
+
+ ret = sdsi_mbox_write(priv, &info, NULL);
+
mutex_unlock(&priv->mb_lock);
free_payload:
@@ -408,7 +417,7 @@ static ssize_t
certificate_read(u64 command, struct sdsi_priv *priv, char *buf, loff_t off,
size_t count)
{
- struct sdsi_mbox_info info;
+ struct sdsi_mbox_info info = {};
size_t size;
int ret;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-01 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-01 1:07 [PATCH 0/8] Intel On Demand: Add netlink interface for SPDM attestation David E. Box
2024-02-01 1:07 ` [PATCH 1/8] platform/x86/intel/sdsi: Set message size during writes David E. Box
2024-02-01 16:49 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-02-08 13:42 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-02-08 21:49 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-02-01 1:07 ` David E. Box [this message]
2024-02-01 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/8] platform/x86/intel/sdsi: Combine read and write mailbox flows Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-02-01 18:11 ` David E. Box
2024-02-08 13:38 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-02-01 1:07 ` [PATCH 3/8] platform/x86/intel/sdsi: Add header file David E. Box
2024-02-08 13:41 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-02-08 21:52 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-02-01 1:07 ` [PATCH 4/8] platform/x86/intel/sdsi: Add netlink SPDM transport David E. Box
2024-02-01 9:26 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-01 16:42 ` David E. Box
2024-02-01 18:00 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-01 1:07 ` [PATCH 5/8] platform/x86/intel/sdsi: Add in-band BIOS lock support David E. Box
2024-02-08 13:52 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-02-01 1:07 ` [PATCH 6/8] platform/x86/intel/sdsi: Add attribute to read the current meter state David E. Box
2024-02-08 14:43 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-02-01 1:07 ` [PATCH 7/8] tools: Fix errors in meter_certificate display David E. Box
2024-02-08 14:46 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-02-01 1:07 ` [PATCH 8/8] tools: intel_sdsi: Add current meter support David E. Box
2024-02-08 14:52 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-02-01 3:49 ` [PATCH 0/8] Intel On Demand: Add netlink interface for SPDM attestation Stephen Hemminger
2024-02-01 16:53 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2024-02-02 1:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240201010747.471141-3-david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--to=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).