From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAC807C6C1; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 19:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706816464; cv=none; b=oi+BjICPfTE1I6yon9Q2hqTUjn9Y31JLY30G5pI8ckgzXLzjLls9B7nslBVrlkFjKz6D47Kp8W9iza7rQx5aH8imLicoO8j3Ac73UURcmretgeO7ZiJWnTB7MSi4fB2XA6Gxh9pNzZYbd0SjNpNw0ms9ypi890MBeoPQtwc1NyI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706816464; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mw8IruWtLhnVBZG2bw57KfvNyrKA6nWlauPlAegiYXo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CDboBe0om26ZBO/wwfNELDeuXzu2DzVwY3VrkZMi1XyAs0cVaGrQYG/hB0F54aDTc1Vrne5GUM98RMKwg1Qkx9yH6ZwF64sWnb2fQXnypQ366FXr7tXmDyhkKPfhl3iBdjqfBXvqrStCh+cER/83VS0n/Wlq8autMCb/VBeTz2s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IbTcrcsZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IbTcrcsZ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2756FC433F1; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 19:41:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1706816464; bh=mw8IruWtLhnVBZG2bw57KfvNyrKA6nWlauPlAegiYXo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IbTcrcsZUbMN85dPQYaJ8qHiKYG7r4m4/vfEYOZMt/h+f2q/V3Jc7gXKXWs+YfMTO 1elg+W0ORBzckh9fcP7CfBW054G/WcsrDwYiK1BmG1m+vN3a9npeL92wIDqwJ/pZeF Hb3Taetog6bGz8vOrfoiDKy01/JZWQfY1NbNmaBTSPTzP7T588bLgP13/Ms1XeVOtQ C0Pdm48g9a65sdi/W9/Hgb31NeKqeoO1TJjndCf7weVP8XYSwz6WpI5uB0uWySEXqj fUvChv/wDo2t0g5vYPMnLoQKDWFl/E3Rtf203kURT5zR3FQPUTLAR4c5NhPWD8xQqd bWhF7rbv7o7Xg== Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 11:40:59 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Breno Leitao Cc: davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, Andrew Morton , Mahesh Bandewar , weiwan@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, andrew@lunn.ch, leit@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] blackhole_dev: Fix buil warning Message-ID: <20240201114059.50b1051c@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20240201133238.3089363-1-leitao@debian.org> <20240201085509.40a0bb76@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 10:46:08 -0800 Breno Leitao wrote: > > Since Jiri suggested a title fix I reckon we should be a bit more > > specific, still. Imagine this title ending up in a quote or a Fixes > > tag, could be many things.. How about: > > > > net: blackhole_dev: fix build warning for ethh set but not used > > Sure, let me resend it. > > I suppose I should recent to `net` given it is a building warning, > right? Not necessarily, net-next is good enough for W=1 warnings in general. Compiler warnings only show up if the file in question or some header it includes was modified. The linker warnings are a bit special. If you touch any file in any module you'll see all linker warnings.