From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9053815E5A0; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 19:12:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706901145; cv=none; b=eKKqD1TYfPz/ClCLOUy02RgN7LxnJOHSJlSDqihOKeznkk9VMCSAJT8oDUUIQUjwAU+k/WnkP41XnndoYLpbzkpsUdlR7RCHlbwlzOamNsJrpTa+3k37s3gbgyCR6Z6sF9S9ezXj2agHoqPDKD8P5+nzxQl1ncm5u4D2g90/iBo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706901145; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hMIwEqns72Iujj9luJhjhuqzqBxbP9VSa+d1KRGXpT4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=daZpY/9x0CRaylLfiSIOMPZUMaRKXH+ve0Py9bc8OHbUw9w+nqyfzAro4Ni9VASU1Pz9vFHlcMln/dUXJRUEmdi4pycYkXkYUwxXbZQ0wjQO4tBh3En3+YhtoU7UTQgvPUJXtGzi6/HHyBHZ1ynkoreHWJ1F3VJsZJtxULAH4HI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JSuhIC8V; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JSuhIC8V" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3F46C433F1; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 19:12:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1706901145; bh=hMIwEqns72Iujj9luJhjhuqzqBxbP9VSa+d1KRGXpT4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JSuhIC8VVQ6atOvmR/wsOQ+bYAF+rtmOZgFQ6kLJNiIykN6l79Rw4rEQsy+nz6PmO DG8sPKH+rsYAPRK5mdx83JgfMLy+FSpl8J9Ldb1t7f+g0pilhT4r7XKu3ts3FAILbT e8haFZmvlZajaiUbWwZS+l+K65nV5IF7BDtkuJ1X295JI94/8QbcHst+iv9cZAMw7D +L0nWPAHoVYrI9EAUhye4dz/5cMeVr/p1Ejs8EmkRIo5NJVhIaUxESPbKUme1PCTTQ WQraiiX6rfWXdMzcgwPv2nfpRmXHz7t1ewHVWeC1uAqQzZpk3ywtbzYxWvZgOMjool A5nAFoEWuUILA== Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 11:12:23 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Paul Moore Cc: George Guo , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , George Guo , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Modify macro NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPTYPE to define a type using typedef Message-ID: <20240202111223.2e0c7db8@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20240202034448.717589-1-dongtai.guo@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:31:37 -0500 Paul Moore wrote: > > Modify NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPTYPE to netlbl_catmap_map_t, which is more > > readable. > > I'm generally not in favor of minor rename patches like this unless > they are part of a larger effort (code churn with little benefit). > I'm not going to block it if the netdev folks want to merge this, but > I can't say I really support it either. FWIW the netdev (or should I say my?) policy is also "don't take it unless explicitly acked by the area maintainer". Looking at the patch I'm not sure why the typedef at all, not just use u64? So whatever, I'm tossing this from pw. Not worth expending brain cycles over.