netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@gmail.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Liang Li <liali@redhat.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 4/4] selftests: bonding: use slowwait instead of hard code sleep
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 09:41:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240203094151.5347fba8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240202023754.932930-5-liuhangbin@gmail.com>

On Fri,  2 Feb 2024 10:37:54 +0800 Hangbin Liu wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_macvlan.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_macvlan.sh
> index b609fb6231f4..acd3ebed3e20 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_macvlan.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_macvlan.sh
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ macvlan_over_bond()
>  	ip -n ${m2_ns} addr add ${m2_ip4}/24 dev macv0
>  	ip -n ${m2_ns} addr add ${m2_ip6}/24 dev macv0
>  
> -	sleep 2
> +	slowwait 2 ip netns exec ${c_ns} ping ${s_ip4} -c 1 -W 0.1 &> /dev/null
>  
>  	check_connection "${c_ns}" "${s_ip4}" "IPv4: client->server"
>  	check_connection "${c_ns}" "${s_ip6}" "IPv6: client->server"
> @@ -69,8 +69,7 @@ macvlan_over_bond()
>  	check_connection "${m1_ns}" "${m2_ip4}" "IPv4: macvlan_1->macvlan_2"
>  	check_connection "${m1_ns}" "${m2_ip6}" "IPv6: macvlan_1->macvlan_2"
>  
> -
> -	sleep 5
> +	slowwait 5 ip netns exec ${s_ns} ping ${c_ip4} -c 1 -W 0.1 &> /dev/null
>  
>  	check_connection "${s_ns}" "${c_ip4}" "IPv4: server->client"
>  	check_connection "${s_ns}" "${c_ip6}" "IPv6: server->client"

This makes the bond_macvlan.sh test flaky:

https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?test=bond-macvlan-sh

I repro'd it and the ping in check_connection() fails - neigh resolution
fails. I guess we need to insert more of the slowwaits?

Reverting this patch from the pending patch tree fixes it. The runner
has no KVM support, and runs a VM with 64 CPUs. If I lower the number
of CPUs to 4 the test passes. I added the note that some flakiness may
be caused by high CPU count:

https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa/wiki/How-to-run-netdev-selftests-CI-style#tips
-- 
pw-bot: cr

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-03 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-02  2:37 [PATCHv3 net-next 0/4] selftests: bonding: use slowwait when waiting Hangbin Liu
2024-02-02  2:37 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 1/4] selftests/net/forwarding: add slowwait functions Hangbin Liu
2024-02-02  2:37 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 2/4] selftests: bonding: use tc filter to check if LACP was sent Hangbin Liu
2024-02-02  2:37 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 3/4] selftests: bonding: reduce garp_test/arp_validate test time Hangbin Liu
2024-02-02  2:37 ` [PATCHv3 net-next 4/4] selftests: bonding: use slowwait instead of hard code sleep Hangbin Liu
2024-02-03 17:41   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-02-04  8:31     ` Hangbin Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240203094151.5347fba8@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=j.vosburgh@gmail.com \
    --cc=liali@redhat.com \
    --cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).