From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1BCD225A8 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 14:24:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707056692; cv=none; b=FXB1+CxHWbpxiIqPGycAVLxloyT+U5Mm9kpSnDq3QjsLlpFqVaIjKCjQgOQajdLeem6355LDMi5L8Hhpefjzbq424go4KRFNJVH91kZ5zzX4P7a6Rq9Yj7YF5FkvIu9ZHYkzXgEZ81IBNRBa+L8hZAeB4UTQAXa0oX+Icgqu2jc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707056692; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gCpB15Us/8TkBdNCL3SxQycgvy+3AfZ+DDRECsuq3fQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=amsPh3om6eDhvyT9hMig7QI902q63d9CIao8/w/QvhMqHOsVU/qQzWwI+xRPPx608b6z9Gws7STdbW1MKJ9EfZyqezLPc6ehoLom9eQcqRsZD156Bw6TouNMA/07eN5MpWui4dy22rMNSomax8k6pEgYRsxo6/cM5YB5sQBo8ok= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YHw07PGx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YHw07PGx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F08B4C433C7; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 14:24:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1707056692; bh=gCpB15Us/8TkBdNCL3SxQycgvy+3AfZ+DDRECsuq3fQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YHw07PGx0b6rzcco83NcG0g8yYCBBrZAfVGo5INfoD4SpbiRfaIn8IkLatXaZguvv 1UAq57s1uh8XaWlQH6fBEJlNuNeGdCZ6hCBBYfdbl8o0DvRJwxs3KKYsiFbLgAfsJB 9id/0jmd9HEEkuestPF8wL1NSkAZ94KA2B994XYvFhXgjQ24ywnr/037RnEPAhuGaj hnmIXhQm73d1Y+CFHfDs28XeaQcgMkwDAMOLCjTaTKrQ8kDuewM5KXLLLzAjX/5zJP 5HEIxUhIYqUsGuM06xIkyKLPu7e7HHz24ze0KKLqhEDJRxXORaRPJOInbGqlGjw0wT 9xj50wTfx9pMg== Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 14:24:48 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Saeed Mahameed Cc: "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Eric Dumazet , Saeed Mahameed , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan , Gal Pressman , Leon Romanovsky , Hamdan Igbaria , Yevgeny Kliteynik Subject: Re: [net-next V3 13/15] net/mlx5: DR, Change SWS usage to debug fs seq_file interface Message-ID: <20240204142448.GA941651@kernel.org> References: <20240202190854.1308089-1-saeed@kernel.org> <20240202190854.1308089-14-saeed@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240202190854.1308089-14-saeed@kernel.org> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 11:08:52AM -0800, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > From: Hamdan Igbaria > > In current SWS debug dump mechanism we implement the seq_file interface, > but we only implement the 'show' callback to dump the whole steering DB > with a single call to this callback. > > However, for large data size the seq_printf function will fail to > allocate a buffer with the adequate capacity to hold such data. > > This patch solves this problem by utilizing the seq_file interface > mechanism in the following way: > - when the user triggers a dump procedure, we will allocate a list of > buffers that hold the whole data dump (in the start callback) > - using the start, next, show and stop callbacks of the seq_file > API we iterate through the list and dump the whole data > > Signed-off-by: Hamdan Igbaria > Reviewed-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik > Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed > --- > .../mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_dbg.c | 735 ++++++++++++++---- > .../mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_dbg.h | 20 + > 2 files changed, 620 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_dbg.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/dr_dbg.c ... > +static struct mlx5dr_dbg_dump_data * > +mlx5dr_dbg_create_dump_data(void) > +{ > + struct mlx5dr_dbg_dump_data *dump_data; > + > + dump_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*dump_data), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!dump_data) > + return NULL; > + > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dump_data->buff_list); > + > + if (!mlx5dr_dbg_dump_data_init_new_buff(dump_data)) > + kfree(dump_data); Hi Hamdan and Saeed, dump_data may be freed above. But it is returned unconditionally below. This seems a little odd. Flagged by Smatch and Coccinelle. > + > + return dump_data; > +} ...