From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A72B50250; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 23:34:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707435282; cv=none; b=lqLPY/7REmvMg/xrxBJFAKXzoY8mU6EuOv+pX94x18gRsr0/jRhd/efY7PLyWbyR3am4FyQgIOV8q4C1g7kjFQNQzHdqa97H1keHcUnx0RMxPKZny2HN3ab7oUnaby53WFO/TkJRgBvNtuX5S1HrEtiKuI5SGMgFVQGDWRT8PHg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707435282; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EJ9Wn0iBaNjCd5QKP1Bx0vkFW1Ydx1VBsnaQxF5lcrw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oB+KWyXGC4lJ9QvaJbTHxDLiXrjhw4QxtQNYO7v3ssPQswoP1SxgvMAq9j/0nRgSB5c9v82lVwpYYePP8S3ccGqJdgBfpTPdssalWl13uU4mYzklVsnYGz0SPQec/KXHRcOglLS9SRSIqyhHwgk8OeBs+GtYlZtQM8p/Cdm5JzM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PgO4IYHq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PgO4IYHq" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42983C433F1; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 23:34:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1707435281; bh=EJ9Wn0iBaNjCd5QKP1Bx0vkFW1Ydx1VBsnaQxF5lcrw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PgO4IYHqabvPBBje1KS18L0mEgBpyk4FJpFCmEBZFITHntLQrNzbrM8/bC0aTkg/U YYuNIi2WsHuJxvwuZ32/NKGDWGQTV4HXeKhFwSXw+xDTcnmhJ/yq1IDIsDWqBta92T uI71U6DDBRb6vlkcOtM8n9Ci3dtyYf1PbKbv/Jl5ufkk3Bspjl+NnzCPEBgXxOiQhc QConIfTSJ+8cgGqbMVwU+msYmjJBc2kSN/cS/OUDoqmfWUKx1Wxz02Vh2XwYjnr18/ cBcN6vD1nfPAF751jvOs9YcqTjFeAg2d7CgJ/DwH8ElXvcZtWEc9xQj2Oi2U7oYcCT FFg6WLo5N/bLw== Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 15:34:40 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Willem de Bruijn Cc: Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Shuah Khan , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: ignore timing errors in txtimestamp if KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW Message-ID: <20240208153440.590685bb@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <65c53ed3bbeee_1ca1e229434@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> References: <65c53ed3bbeee_1ca1e229434@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 15:51:31 -0500 Willem de Bruijn wrote: > Paolo Abeni wrote: > > This test is time sensitive. It may fail on virtual machines and for > > debug builds. > > > > Similar to commit c41dfb0dfbec ("selftests/net: ignore timing errors in > > so_txtime if KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW"), optionally suppress failure for timing > > errors (only). > > > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni > > Is this still failing after commit 5264ab612e28 > ("selftests/net: calibrate txtimestamp")? On a debug kernel it continues to flake :( https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/flakes.html?br-cnt=80&tn-needle=txtimestamp&min-flip=0