From: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
To: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
tariqt@nvidia.com, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
"open list:MELLANOX MLX5 core VPI driver"
<linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net/mlx5e: link NAPI instances to queues and IRQs
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 11:24:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240209192404.GA1430@fastly.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871q9mz1a0.fsf@nvidia.com>
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 08:43:57PM -0800, Rahul Rameshbabu wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Feb, 2024 21:13:25 +0200 Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 08/02/2024 5:07, Joe Damato wrote:
> >> Make mlx5 compatible with the newly added netlink queue GET APIs.
> >> Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
> >> ---
>
> Just came back from testing this code. Let me make one cosmetic point
> here. I noticed this patch has a line that is past 90 characters. Would
> be nice to get it wrapped in the next version. We use 90 instead of 80
> characters for the line wrap in the mlx5 driver because of firmware
> command interface related code would lead to very hard to read lines if
> wrapped at 80.
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20240208030702.27296-1-jdamato@fastly.com/
OK, I had wrapped them in the next version I was going to send to 80, but
I'll adjust that to 90.
> >> v2 -> v3:
> >> - Fix commit message subject
> >> - call netif_queue_set_napi in mlx5e_ptp_activate_channel and
> >> mlx5e_ptp_deactivate_channel to enable/disable NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX for
> >> the PTP channel.
> >> - Modify mlx5e_activate_txqsq and mlx5e_deactivate_txqsq to set
> >> NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX which should take care of all TX queues including
> >> QoS/HTB and PTP.
> >> - Rearrange mlx5e_activate_channel and mlx5e_deactivate_channel for
> >> better ordering when setting and unsetting NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX NAPI
> >> structs
> >> v1 -> v2:
> >> - Move netlink NULL code to mlx5e_deactivate_channel
> >> - Move netif_napi_set_irq to mlx5e_open_channel and avoid storing the
> >> irq, after netif_napi_add which itself sets the IRQ to -1
> >> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/ptp.c | 3 +++
> >> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 7 +++++++
> >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/ptp.c
> >> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/ptp.c
> >> index 078f56a3cbb2..fbbc287d924d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/ptp.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/ptp.c
> >> @@ -927,6 +927,8 @@ void mlx5e_ptp_activate_channel(struct mlx5e_ptp *c)
> >> int tc;
> >> napi_enable(&c->napi);
> >> + netif_queue_set_napi(c->netdev, c->rq.ix, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX,
> >> + &c->napi);
>
> This should only be set if MLX5E_PTP_STATE_RX is set. Otherwise, the rq
> is not initialized. The following callgraph should help illustrate this.
>
> mlx5e_ptp_open
> |_ mlx5e_ptp_open_queues
> |_ mlx5e_ptp_open_rq
> |_ mlx5e_open_rq
I had made the change that Tariq had suggested in the previous message of
using sq->netdev and sq->cq.napi, but I can also tie that into
MLX5E_PTP_STATE_RX.
I'll add this change as well, test locally again and resend shortly.
> >> if (test_bit(MLX5E_PTP_STATE_TX, c->state)) {
> >> for (tc = 0; tc < c->num_tc; tc++)
> >> @@ -951,6 +953,7 @@ void mlx5e_ptp_deactivate_channel(struct mlx5e_ptp *c)
> >> mlx5e_deactivate_txqsq(&c->ptpsq[tc].txqsq);
> >> }
> >> + netif_queue_set_napi(c->netdev, c->rq.ix, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX, NULL);
>
> I believe it would be best to tie this to whether MLX5E_PTP_STATE_RX is
> set or not.
>
> >> napi_disable(&c->napi);
> >> }
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> >> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> >> index c8e8f512803e..2f1792854dd5 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> >> @@ -1806,6 +1806,7 @@ void mlx5e_activate_txqsq(struct mlx5e_txqsq *sq)
> >> set_bit(MLX5E_SQ_STATE_ENABLED, &sq->state);
> >> netdev_tx_reset_queue(sq->txq);
> >> netif_tx_start_queue(sq->txq);
> >> + netif_queue_set_napi(sq->channel->netdev, sq->txq_ix, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX, &sq->channel->napi);
> >
> > Might be called with channel==NULL.
> > For example for PTP.
> >
> > Prefer sq->netdev and sq->cq.napi.
> >
> >> }
> >> void mlx5e_tx_disable_queue(struct netdev_queue *txq)
> >> @@ -1819,6 +1820,7 @@ void mlx5e_deactivate_txqsq(struct mlx5e_txqsq *sq)
> >> {
> >> struct mlx5_wq_cyc *wq = &sq->wq;
> >> + netif_queue_set_napi(sq->channel->netdev, sq->txq_ix,
> >> NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX, NULL);
> >
> > Same here.
> >
> >> clear_bit(MLX5E_SQ_STATE_ENABLED, &sq->state);
> >> synchronize_net(); /* Sync with NAPI to prevent netif_tx_wake_queue. */
> >> @@ -2560,6 +2562,7 @@ static int mlx5e_open_channel(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> >> int ix,
> >> c->lag_port = mlx5e_enumerate_lag_port(priv->mdev, ix);
> >> netif_napi_add(netdev, &c->napi, mlx5e_napi_poll);
> >> + netif_napi_set_irq(&c->napi, irq);
> >> err = mlx5e_open_queues(c, params, cparam);
> >> if (unlikely(err))
> >> @@ -2602,12 +2605,16 @@ static void mlx5e_activate_channel(struct mlx5e_channel *c)
> >> mlx5e_activate_xsk(c);
> >> else
> >> mlx5e_activate_rq(&c->rq);
> >> +
> >> + netif_queue_set_napi(c->netdev, c->ix, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX, &c->napi);
> >> }
> >> static void mlx5e_deactivate_channel(struct mlx5e_channel *c)
> >> {
> >> int tc;
> >> + netif_queue_set_napi(c->netdev, c->ix, NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX, NULL);
> >> +
> >> if (test_bit(MLX5E_CHANNEL_STATE_XSK, c->state))
> >> mlx5e_deactivate_xsk(c);
> >> else
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Rahul Rameshbabu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-09 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-08 3:07 [PATCH net-next v3] net/mlx5e: link NAPI instances to queues and IRQs Joe Damato
2024-02-08 17:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-08 19:13 ` Tariq Toukan
2024-02-08 19:41 ` Joe Damato
2024-02-09 4:43 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-02-09 19:24 ` Joe Damato [this message]
2024-02-09 19:26 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240209192404.GA1430@fastly.com \
--to=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=rrameshbabu@nvidia.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=ttoukan.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).