From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBAD331A94 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 12:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707481590; cv=none; b=lA/QTUmtvjojLBe/xj0dQDPLnlAU5NlDJhr3QhTB4a5E6p1hMzBrdT1qXURiRYdtgWQomLz7IWhco7eOhAGVePytEXIEz9sD9e5JuUKGtip8fapam+cQ4ybbVx467HsXNiQwezOyWpmFItqVcvwR5hnjYrN4TX4lL7Phgn3GA9U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707481590; c=relaxed/simple; bh=70VXlrFVCBWr5hwjUeNpAFqInIs90LUlUBY2pt8udAQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mjp3WyWDtohl5kNCfKt1C+g2OyL7W/yEbprYpVp0Nau+2nfq2XupG5FfKzHXQMTJHRPgtr9nm2qCWlH3ozg/MtxI3IQvKEDDWpTWxGerCvxkWjhKindrNpUbfvRsifPsQsW+HKFo24U68otlVwwefEjWJMY6G8Y0WWvVPGCdKAA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=gZu5kw6i; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="gZu5kw6i" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1707481588; x=1739017588; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=70VXlrFVCBWr5hwjUeNpAFqInIs90LUlUBY2pt8udAQ=; b=gZu5kw6isGgt+p4OWxyXY7TgD/wlLcAmHJ8MYgpGIpx/5cdDmwcbrPLp EbX5HsaBfFER/ln51BoEa1+3CGQh/yRNJcAYs6XeSq+cptFkN2Vyjnysk ofhA3G7RzqTc3P0UyI+Hecxvtg2uyuA2rGvdxKs9Qfs8lPGICvgjD0LG8 PxtdBEJ23Gd2WRdm4xbJdJW1dyviBt8ejASy3xZkXFA7nvWoz3jz2N8Nj HQcNW6PlmKj2jvMB1M8StCIEkljoy9bdRZBh8ZjmWWQ+zReXJ/iHcGVA/ ezGycE1G7QYP3rmgDFawee2Z+WOWEN1tyoPRG0XKwwVx7js59g3q7+Jbx g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10978"; a="1564263" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,256,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="1564263" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2024 04:26:27 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10978"; a="825127893" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,256,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="825127893" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 01f0647817ea) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2024 04:26:24 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 01f0647817ea with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rYPxW-0004hg-1W; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 12:26:22 +0000 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 20:26:00 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Eric Dumazet , "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, David Ahern , netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] ipmr: use exit_batch_rtnl method Message-ID: <202402092023.Upwn6RGF-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240208111646.535705-4-edumazet@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240208111646.535705-4-edumazet@google.com> Hi Eric, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on net-next/main] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Eric-Dumazet/ip6mr-use-exit_batch_rtnl-method/20240208-192057 base: net-next/main patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240208111646.535705-4-edumazet%40google.com patch subject: [PATCH net-next 3/4] ipmr: use exit_batch_rtnl method config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-rust (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240209/202402092023.Upwn6RGF-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240209/202402092023.Upwn6RGF-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402092023.Upwn6RGF-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> net/ipv4/ipmr.c:3134:16: error: incompatible function pointer types initializing 'void (*)(struct list_head *)' with an expression of type 'void (struct list_head *, struct list_head *)' [-Wincompatible-function-pointer-types] 3134 | .exit_batch = ipmr_exit_batch_rtnl, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 error generated. vim +3134 net/ipv4/ipmr.c 3130 3131 static struct pernet_operations ipmr_net_ops = { 3132 .init = ipmr_net_init, 3133 .exit = ipmr_net_exit, > 3134 .exit_batch = ipmr_exit_batch_rtnl, 3135 }; 3136 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki