From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: shuah@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
jakub@cloudflare.com, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:44:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240213154416.422739-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
Hi!
When running selftests for our subsystem in our CI we'd like all
tests to pass. Currently some tests use SKIP for cases they
expect to fail, because the kselftest_harness limits the return
codes to pass/fail/skip.
Clean up and support the use of the full range of ksft exit codes
under kselftest_harness.
To avoid conflicts and get the functionality into the networking
tree ASAP I'd like to put the patches on shared branch so that
both linux-kselftest and net-next can pull it in. Shuah, please
LMK if that'd work for you, and if so which -rc should I base
the branch on. Or is merging directly into net-next okay?
Jakub Kicinski (4):
selftests: kselftest_harness: pass step via shared memory
selftests: kselftest_harness: use KSFT_* exit codes
selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail
selftests: ip_local_port_range: use XFAIL instead of SKIP
tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h | 67 ++++++++++++++-----
.../selftests/net/ip_local_port_range.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-02-13 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-13 15:44 Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-02-13 15:44 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] selftests: kselftest_harness: pass step via shared memory Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-13 17:54 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-19 2:21 ` kernel test robot
2024-02-13 15:44 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] selftests: kselftest_harness: use KSFT_* exit codes Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-13 17:55 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-13 15:44 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-13 17:57 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-14 19:40 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2024-02-14 21:46 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2024-02-15 0:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-15 0:40 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-15 22:06 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-15 22:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-13 15:44 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] selftests: ip_local_port_range: use XFAIL instead of SKIP Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-13 17:57 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-13 18:00 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] selftests: kselftest_harness: support using xfail Kees Cook
2024-02-14 10:09 ` Jakub Sitnicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240213154416.422739-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).