From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AC838F40 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707877228; cv=none; b=mexsZdPawclvuYrVc5iObNZq8Hohww876lyxX9XqVMgYFSuXT3KcItWXeSPLrpT2WlzIufe77ckySAGWpbgR8FnE6oFCSRvOTnnGFuKU4+wQ1eQSO5vhc4szr0Lsmr4y+osxP5mh5IfF2dhlbfNy/Jws+8q/YcDEalaARF8P2wY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707877228; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IM2w7Nsuxp3F9mzK9O6I93M+uzTRaISlf21iTzuUAWE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GLHpPhTq86nhkd2Mc7APApvyueWTAVCx2uieUrLHNH4sxN7qF2n6zX+Rj5+Qcl6sLSPUcKBU430E2oOx+N04EsiPnR0kOQD+T81GPNS3RT6eG/v6mx9zS8iCQEOcv0ONWwFZxxb1wU3RQqySjWYw5V9gNL9Z4tp4fi/DUG0hpIs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UQ+4fnQv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UQ+4fnQv" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C8F4C433C7; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 02:20:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1707877228; bh=IM2w7Nsuxp3F9mzK9O6I93M+uzTRaISlf21iTzuUAWE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UQ+4fnQvPPF5reDJ69iCOPONH/aqjJDNnWcDDFXZ/sd893G9FNx++Xi+X9Izhfpiq G9rCLJjcf+pFmzRb838NEfosif83iRigXT3Sj5+Ltt4AoZjXxLEFKBbkPnLiNjUIW4 18cV5XJ8p1cTGVDoByZQKUihOoa6zOsgv02iuYfBH1s6SEN1/5/Kex+bGmPJg+wBkf 30GdLpi9TQohg9oc5BkiTnr1ZNmpRGeYoMZ+TCPWDghE16EMV1zV7NJPW3hRYcWXIF 3tCHLUiDvaLamuBv5n1nZySTzTP9LURSGcGijxybi7ER1VdZnhDbKGZZzabR4l8SAE KXVTgmcM0HZmw== Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 18:20:26 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Tony Nguyen Cc: Andrew Lunn , , , , , Kurt Kanzenbach , , Naama Meir Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] igc: Add support for LEDs on i225/i226 Message-ID: <20240213182026.7c14d7d4@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <11004b9c-97df-fb6f-efb8-9550ea2b6c03@intel.com> References: <20240213184138.1483968-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> <7a6ae4c1-2436-4909-bb20-32b91210803c@lunn.ch> <24b89ed0-2c2c-2aff-fa59-8ee8f9f22e9a@intel.com> <11004b9c-97df-fb6f-efb8-9550ea2b6c03@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 13:05:43 -0800 Tony Nguyen wrote: > > State: Awaiting Upstream > > For Awaiting Upstream: > > " > patch should be reviewed and handled by appropriate sub-maintainer, who > will send it on to the networking trees; patches set to Awaiting > upstream in netdev's patchwork will usually remain in this state, > whether the sub-maintainer requested changes, accepted or rejected the patch > " > https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html#patch-status FWIW I think it's one of those things where particular cases may look odd, but for those on the patch handling path always following the same procedure make the life *so* much easier :(